azazel1024
Very Senior Member
Something to keep in mind, I assume you are using the default h.264 options. Cranking quality can make a big difference, as well as file size. Just thinking about the i7-4790 rates...
Under .10.1 with my i5-3570 cranked to 4GHz, I pump out around 8-10FPS with my current very high quality settings for 1080p to 1080p encodes. Of course I can turn it down and a 480p to 480p is well up in to the several hundred frames a second range. I have pretty exacting demands for quality as well as compressed size.
That is with NR turned off BTW (which I only use for really noise source material with a ultra light or light NR pass. That can take things down to 4-6FPS with NR on. I shudder to think what 4k to 4k would be. I'll need a Canonlake-E octocore processor to even think about it with my kind of settings...let alone h.265 *sob*)
Under .10.1 with my i5-3570 cranked to 4GHz, I pump out around 8-10FPS with my current very high quality settings for 1080p to 1080p encodes. Of course I can turn it down and a 480p to 480p is well up in to the several hundred frames a second range. I have pretty exacting demands for quality as well as compressed size.
That is with NR turned off BTW (which I only use for really noise source material with a ultra light or light NR pass. That can take things down to 4-6FPS with NR on. I shudder to think what 4k to 4k would be. I'll need a Canonlake-E octocore processor to even think about it with my kind of settings...let alone h.265 *sob*)