Windows has a lot of overhead in NTFS and NTFS<->samba. I think it's more than a NAS and its file system as Linux drivers and stacks tend to be leaner and less layers of abstraction than in .net.
re post #22 - confuses me - my point was that NTFS on windows combined with samba is much slower than windows-to-windows LAN transfers.
My experience is that NTFS on Linux and the NAS is much slower than under windows.
Oh. NTFS-3G .. new term for me.And that is definitely correct, especially when using NTFS-3G. We were just talking about two different things there.
Oh. NTFS-3G .. new term for me.
Oh. NTFS-3G .. new term for me.
Thread starter | Title | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
B | Lenovo IX2-DL Asking for Original Drives After Power Adapter Failure | General NAS Discussion | 15 |
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!