sfx2000
Part of the Furniture
Sharing some quick thoughts on QNAP's TimeMachine experience...
1) It's really fast compared to a TimeCapsule, not quite as fast as a local drive
2) Not quite as fast perhaps - on a TS-453Pro compared to a MacMini running OS X Server with an attached USB3/FW800/Thunderbolt drive
3) With 5 clients backing up to the QNAP - after a month or so, all the sparse bundles end up corrupted, and El Cap's TimeMachine Client states that the backup has various issues, and gives up - starting a new backup, nuking the old one - this only happens so far on QNAP as compared to direct attached drives, OS X Server, or Apple's TimeCapsule...
4) QNAP's Backup Station - doesn't see, nor can backup, the TimeMachine backup stores - so lose the NAS, lose the backup stores...
So for the moment, can't recommend using QNAP's TimeMachine support...
1) It's really fast compared to a TimeCapsule, not quite as fast as a local drive
2) Not quite as fast perhaps - on a TS-453Pro compared to a MacMini running OS X Server with an attached USB3/FW800/Thunderbolt drive
3) With 5 clients backing up to the QNAP - after a month or so, all the sparse bundles end up corrupted, and El Cap's TimeMachine Client states that the backup has various issues, and gives up - starting a new backup, nuking the old one - this only happens so far on QNAP as compared to direct attached drives, OS X Server, or Apple's TimeCapsule...
4) QNAP's Backup Station - doesn't see, nor can backup, the TimeMachine backup stores - so lose the NAS, lose the backup stores...
So for the moment, can't recommend using QNAP's TimeMachine support...