Recent content by Booboo22

Awesome. Since MaxLinear is the only game in town you see the same general form factor too. The chipset vendors provide a 'reference-design' that you can just copy and make gear. The next effect is that the performance, provided they followed the recommendations, should be identical from...

That's because there's only one vendor of MoCA 2.5 chipsets: MaxLinear so all OEMs take the software from MaxLinear and simply rebrand it.

For completeness, keep in mind that the signalling rate is higher than the effective throughput. *If* the MoCA adapter had a sufficiently fast Ethernet port you would see 2.5Gpbs. In reality, you will be limited by the 1Gpbs port. Some newer MoCA 2.5 adapters are starting to appear with the...

The table shows From / To. So node 0 has a signalling MAC rate of 701 (time 5), Node 1 has a rate of 698 (time 5), and so forth. You read the table by looking at the speed from one node to another. So the signalling rate from node 2 to node 1 is 3455. And from 1 to 2 is 3463. You are seeing...

According to your posts, you should be getting 1 Gbps on all locations. The MoCA adapters have a signalling rate of > 3 Gbps between nodes, so you should have great connectivity. From the point of view of the diag. page you are looking at, nodes will be assigned numbers based on which ones are...

As @jrmtz85 states, this is a straight forward troubleshooting. Test just 2 adapters. First basement to living room, get rid of the splitter.... Then test basement to master. And so forth. I'm wondering if the thin coax is RJ-59 and old / damaged. ideally you want RJ-6 quad-shield. Also...

I use these and work great, but be aware that for iperf3 testing you can only achieve the highspeed with parallel mode. Try with the -P parameter and maybe 5 streams.

Other similar products include the Zyxel MoCA 2.0 bridge and the Motoroal MoCA 2.0 bridge; same factory.

Ah those Actiontec listings must be new, thanks for pointing out. Other OEM relationships include the Teamly TDNM250 and the Kiwee units appear to the the same device.

Some of these are also OEM units; I believe the GoCoax is actually manufactured by CIG (Cambridge Industries Group): https://www.cigtech.com/home-networking/ Or GoCoax is the retail branding they are using in the US; don't know. But the GoCoax WF-803M seems the same as the CIG WF-803M.

I don't believe the Actiontec is available outside telco OEM use... so most everyone reading this won't be able to purchase them. Also worth mentioning (and double checking if you can...) that all MoCA 2.5 devices today are using the Maxlinear chipset. I understand other vendors, such as...

Sorry, I don't see the problem... The last screenshot shows how from adapter 1 to adapter 2 you have 3.5Gbps and from adapter 2 to adapter 1 you also have 3.5Gbps. Thats the physical layer connection (PHY) so you should have 2.5Gbps bandwidth. The adapters only have 1Gbps Ethenret ports so the...

No, it doesn't seem like the MoCA firmware has been updated in quite some time on these units. At least for me, the MoCA firmware didn't change during general Arris firmware upgrades. Regarding the PoE, you only need one in the ingress to the house; so no, don't add one at the modem. Won't...

They will do very well... I have bonded MoCA 2.0 and they deliver 940Mbps over a 40 meter coax segment. You won't get more than that with the gocoax 2.5 as the limit is the GigE port, not MoCA in this case.

I suggest the Antronix PoE instead, better brand: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01EXRMIIC/?tag=snbforums-20 Use the smallest splitter possible. I would use the first option you showed, not the Satellite version.