Recent content by dlukanidin

GT-AX6000 with the same ver of firmware is connected with ASUS app in iOs 16.7.2 (when I buy new phone then I will try the new iOs )))

It exist in current version, and was in almost all previous. Time to time I can see icon for master or some of nodes. I think it is error in firmware logic for some settings or situations. I reported this but nothing was changed.

NO and there are no files with language or country suffixes at this link

AiMesh page shows abstract device icons in Web UI because it try to load files with URL as https://nw-dlcdnet.asus.com/plugin/productIcons/RT-AX88U-PL.png and can not find it. If I load file https://nw-dlcdnet.asus.com/plugin/productIcons/RT-AX88U.png it's OK Why Web UI load files with -PL...

It is old version of firmware. 3.0.0.6 does not have such options.

All of this may or may not work in normal situation. But I wrote about IOT network created by AX6000. Smart devices does not switch to another standalone AP (not mesh node) with -54dBM and stay connected with -94dBM to AX6000 if it was started first until it will be rebooted. Distance between...

I found it myself, not a solution but it works for me: 1. nvram show | grep MY_IOT_SSID show for me wl0.1_ssid=MY_IOT_SSID 2. For one smart device nvram set wl0.1_macmode=deny nvram set wl0.1_maclist=XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX nvram set wl0.1_maclist_x='<XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX' nvram commit service...

My config: AX6000 - mesh master, AX86U + AX88U mesh nodes, AC68U - AP for IOT in stand alone building. Why AC68 - because mesh nodes doesn't support new firmware feature Guest Network Pro/IOT network. Smart devices from stand alone building try to connect to AX6000 with bad signal. To prevent...

Thanks but it's really strange, for master it shows the correct icon

AX88U 3.0.0.4.388_20518 AiMesh node info shows abstract icon not from device but DHCP static table shows right icon (I don't know from where it copies icon to /jffs/usericon). Anybody know how to set right icon?

I don’t have any other networks nearby at all. Only two my networks: first for clients - AiMesh on AX88 and AC86 (fixed channel 48), and second for transport to remote building - on two Ubiquiti Nano Station (fixed channel 149/40 MHz (Upper)). So no interfering from other networks. I use WiFi...

Thanks, it's more clear. The algorithm itself, I think, in the Broadcom proprietary code.

Thank you all and especially RAH-66. I will be glad also to see another opinions.

What is better 160 or 20/40/80/160 in terms of communication quality and different devices compatibility works in practice

>wl -i $(nvram get "wl1_ifname") radar_status NO RADAR DETECTED >wl -i $(nvram get "wl1_ifname") dfs_status state IDLE time elapsed 0ms radar channel cleared by dfs none It works. I test it now. But what means 20/40/80/160 if 160 only works the same?