Menu
What's new
By:
Filters Better Search

Recent content by EnF70

  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

  1. EnF70

    [How-To] Link Aggregation/LACP on RT-AC68U/W/R/P

    I got close to 1Gb through the router with the CPU maxed out. It is definitively better with just 1 cable between the router and the switch and without LAG. Between the switch and the NAS I get the full 2Gb with at least 2 clients. Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
  2. EnF70

    [How-To] Link Aggregation/LACP on RT-AC68U/W/R/P

    Stopped using LAG on the router as I found some performance issues. CPU not fast enough to handle the LAG traffic.
  3. EnF70

    [Release] FreshJR Adaptive QOS (Improvements / Custom Rules / and Inner workings)

    I had LAG (link aggregation) enabled on 2 LAN ports using the bonding driver but I stopped using it. Apart from issues with QoS there are also LAN traffic performance issues associated so it's not worth it. Back to the normal setup now, thanks for your script, playing with it at the moment.
  4. EnF70

    [Release] FreshJR Adaptive QOS (Improvements / Custom Rules / and Inner workings)

    Is there a specific mark to exclude some traffic from QoS? Having issues with LAG traffic on the LAN being restricted by QoS.
  5. EnF70

    [How-To] Link Aggregation/LACP on RT-AC68U/W/R/P

    Traffic classification seems to be working fine in 384.6 (LAG traffic included) but same issues with QoS as above.
  6. EnF70

    [How-To] Link Aggregation/LACP on RT-AC68U/W/R/P

    Just wanted to say thanks for the info provided and that I am using LAG / LACP for some time now. One thing to mention is that I had to disable QOS on the router to make it work properly. For some reason the LAG traffic is classified as Internet traffic (it also shows in the "Traffic Analyzer"...
  7. EnF70

    CPU 100% usage after power cut - RT-AC3200

    Decided to do a Factory reset as those two processes were still using a lot of CPU even after a couple of reboots. So the issue might not be related to a power cut or to the order in which the modem and router rebooted.
  8. EnF70

    CPU 100% usage after power cut - RT-AC3200

    I got this a couple of times already, with older versions and with 380.68.2. After a power cut the router reboots faster than the Virgin Media modem (bridge) and it gets into this state. CPU is 100% on both cores and the router overheats, I think after some time nothing works, a reboot of the...
  9. EnF70

    Wi-Fi 5GHz issue with Nexus-6P and Asus RT-AC87U router

    Update: Just discovered that a MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Late 2013) using 802.11 ac is also affected on the 5GHz WiFi. Very similar to the Nexus 6P, ping and low-latency video streaming issues. Another MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Early 2013) which only supports 802.11 a/b/g/n is not...
  10. EnF70

    OpenVPN performance

    Yes, that one. But I have two rules, one for each OpenVPN instance (tun21 and tun22). I use one OpenVPN instance for UDP and one for TCP (for networks that don't allow UDP).
  11. EnF70

    OpenVPN performance

    I use my original rules (the ones included in Alpha3) but the one mentioned above works just as well. I still believe it's sufficient to mark individual packets in the PREROUTING chain to work-around the CTF issue rather than do it per connection and involve the connection tracking mechanism...
  12. EnF70

    OpenVPN performance

    I know, I see the rules in iptables - thanks for adding them :) I'm flushing the chains before testing different rules and I tested Alpha3 with no rules at all. That's why I said that there are still issues with CTF enabled if we don't mark packets.
  13. EnF70

    dropbear parameters

    Nice work, thanks for sharing :)
  14. EnF70

    OpenVPN performance

    I am on Alpha3 and I think there are still issues with CTF enabled if we don't mark packets. Can you post again the latest rule, I want to make sure I get the correct one. (I can still see a connmark in the latest one) EDIT: I think I know which one you are referring to now: iptables -t mangle...
  15. EnF70

    OpenVPN performance

    Now I understand why it works with "--or-mark 0". It doesn't matter what value we mark the packets with. It seems there is a difference between unmarked and marked packets. I thought a default mark of 0 (zero) is present on all packets but it seems that's not the case. I changed my rule to use...
See more
Top