Recent content by eng3

I also tried connecting through MOCA but with a 2ft RG6 and here is what I get: iperf3.exe -P 5 -w 2M -c 172.17.17.19 Connecting to host 172.17.17.19, port 5201 [ 4] local 172.17.17.13 port 62928 connected to 172.17.17.19 port 5201 [ 6] local 172.17.17.13 port 62929 connected to 172.17.17.19...

Well the "target" NIC is the same for both tests and connects through my ER-X router (which has the WIFI AP connect to it so that can't be the bottleneck. I tried connecting the laptop directly into the router and here is what I get: iperf3.exe -P 5 -w 2M -c 172.17.17.19 Connecting to host...

WIFI: >iperf3.exe -P 5 -w 2M -c 172.17.17.19 Connecting to host 172.17.17.19, port 5201 [ 4] local 172.17.17.21 port 59909 connected to 172.17.17.19 port 5201 [ 6] local 172.17.17.21 port 59910 connected to 172.17.17.19 port 5201 [ 8] local 172.17.17.21 port 59911 connected to 172.17.17.19...

Here are my iperf results: I tried over moca and wifi as a comparison MOCA: iperf3.exe -P 5 -w 2M -c 172.17.17.19 Connecting to host 172.17.17.19, port 5201 [ 4] local 172.17.17.13 port 49847 connected to 172.17.17.19 port 5201 [ 6] local 172.17.17.13 port 49848 connected to 172.17.17.19...

Yes, I did see that when I read the thread. However, I also read comments that it is not a realistic way to measure speed since not all connections are parallel. In the end, this will be mostly be used for file transfers and streaming video. I did not mention it in my original post, but I did...

I just purchased two of these. I have RG6 in my house that runs from each room to a central splitter outside. I disconnected the two that goto the two rooms I want to connect and connected them with a Coax coupler. I don't know exactly how the cables are routed through the house but I'm...