Recent content by Jasso

Anyone any ideas about this System Log entry. Mar 8 17:51:34 dnsmasq[427]: Insecure DS reply received for CAL4H2OAMDHS2O8LF710QT5O3AQJ7GHO.com, check domain configuration and upstream DNS server DNSSEC support

Thanks for that, I was thinking of Gigafast as CityFibre are everywhere here at the moment I should have made this clear. My BT contract is up next month and Vodafone would slash £20 pm off my bill, so I am seriously tempted but BT has been rock solid

I am trying to find out if I can use my router with Vodafone broadband as they deliver PSTN using VOIP. The chatline is useless as they don't know and are unable to find out. Does anyone have any info on this?

Updated to 384.18 and now system log is flooded by these....... Jun 29 19:25:27 dnsmasq[420]: failed to send packet: Operation not permitted Jun 29 19:25:27 dnsmasq[420]: failed to send packet: Operation not permitted Jun 29 19:25:27 dnsmasq[420]: failed to send packet: Operation not permitted...

Are there any likely problems with dirty flash from 384.15?

Tried again this time with fresh download. SHA signatures OK but the log entries are back, so I reckon I'll stick with 384.15 . Thanks for your help

Did you get a fix for this? I had the same problem but got no answer ... back to 384.15 and OK

Upgraded to 384.16 now getting shed loads of these in system log, any ideas anyone? dnsmasq(316): failed to send packet: Operation not permitted

It annoys me, so in General Log I changed Log only messages more urgent than to Notice, a bodge but hey!

Upgraded to 384.14, DNSSEC resolver test fails and IPv6 test fails. Reverted to Beta 3 for a while seems OK so far.

Upgraded to 384.11_2 and now 2.4G download speed halved, 5G unaffected

All sorted , thanks for that.

Thanks for that, the Web access option is a little obscure I presume its the specified IP option.