Recent content by jasz

Likely a compatibility issue. You should really test a different router to make sure theres not something funky going on with the AX86U platform. XB8 is a BCM3390 DOCSIS platform tied to 3x BCM6715 Gen 2 4x4 radios. Don't see any alt CPU in unit, granted the 6715's have their own A7's for...

I think it ends up more silly when it comes to the lower end SoC stuff Broadcom offers. A7 on those triple/quad's pools everything from what I can see. Granted.. a 4x4 "add on chip" has it's own "A7" for processing. Significantly weaker than B53 + "A7" 4x4 they offer. IE: Evolved "Penta...

Just commenting where US ISP's are heading on hardware end. Custom ONT/ONU's and D4.0 will be equipped with 10G Ethernet. Many fiber companies already have 8 gig speed tiers in most major cities. Spectrum (ISP) for example will offer both DPoE 10G PON (Newer development) and D4.0 (Legacy...

There will be an influx of US ISPs providing 10G copper solutions in the next couple years. DOCSIS 4.0 + XGS PON Migration. DOCSIS 4.0 side will require swapping out the nodes, taps, and connectors for ones capable of 1.8ghz. Spectrum for example is currently migrating to high split in major...

Nice looking design. Lacks SFP (Prob wont matter as much in North America unless we move past 10G), but has dual 10G for switch routing to home panel.

I'm glad you want to show off, but I'm pretty certain you knew what I was referring to when it comes to TX lock rates at distance/SNR Maybe I should have said MCS index instead....happy? Either way.. We're way off topic.. I just wanted to know why this ONT or back end service impacts WL...

???? What are you even saying lol You're making a simple subject overcomplicated for no reason. If I have a 2x2 device locking into a lower QAM tier, it doesn't matter if its 2x2 or 4x4....

And that matters how? 4x4 vs 2x2 wont change QAM modulation

What do you mean.. im using a 5/6ghz client and dipping into sub 1024 rates.

It's a consumer BE800. It's been out for a year.... IPQ9574

It's definitely packet related given a straight RJ45 connection is more consistent, but susceptible to said issue. I just laugh and cry myself to sleep every time I reset a GUI stats setting and instantly get full throughput to servers innately bottlenecking at 1/4th the speed prior. Even on...

Nothing seems to matter... I've power cycled around 6 different routers here.. The QCA 1220 platform is the strongest for throughput, when it doesn't even make sense. Just going to assuming its a routing conflict and I need more RAM and or RISC V on ONT end. Issue happens on wired, just less...

It's fine.. I just want you to explain why a why 2x2 device will bottleneck throughput unless I reset my ONT via SC/ACP, Clearing stats or running an ONT>OLT speed test. No one seems to have a clue. 4x4 connection can hold higher throughput, even at lower QAM rates. Not a wireless interference...

I really don't care if you wanna ego me. lol Why would it matter.. Just making the argument that certain samples do perform better (same channel, same bonding. same firmware.. same everything settings wise). If you don't believe me, thats fine ;)

Wherever the network processing is offloaded for wireless. 4x4 BCM radios have their own internal processing on radio and wont even touch the main B53. Not exactly sure how it works on QCA. Can you explain why a fiber ONT can process higher throughput when internal stats are cleared or an ONT...