Recent content by pete y testing

and until you get rid of all your none wifi 6 clients they will continue to make the wifi 6 platform perform poorly and not reach its potential , never mind the missing or yet to be enabled features that wifi 6 make up plus as tim has pointed out ofdma doesnt even work until there are at least...

and still asking a price that in no way reflects the technology , sure ppl can buy what ever they want whenever they want and some may have deep pockets and can afford to spend up big but like the new cell phones its start to become a bit of a shock at the price they are asking for a "phone /...

im in australia , so average wage is 1k and these ax mesh systems are 1k plus here , just seems like manufactures are screwing us over and making huge profits

so here , $1000 is the average weekly wage , and not something easily got , i prob can see the benefit of a single ax router but these ax mesh system is prob where im coming from 1K plus here and apart from better wireless coverage they do all the same thing as the last gen ac mesh systems

hi guys been a while since i was here but ive been looking at mesh system of late and have become really astonished at the price the manufactures are asking for ax and ax mesh , when did we go from $300 being a top of the line wireless router to $500 , then $750 all in what i see as a fairly...

so lets ask that question again , how do you know its so awesome , what clients do you have that can take advantage or even have the capability , i bet if you sat an ac router next to an ax router with OFDMA enabled and even mu-mimo enabled you would not notice any difference with a mixed client...

10,000 sq feet really , im mean really even if they claimed 5,000 sq feet from a single tranmission point router i would have serious doubts so sorry but im calling that advertising bs at this stage , ax is better over distance as i have seen with the asus rt-ax92u but thats only between the...

so it seems netgear may have made the decision to not have 4 x 4 160mhz on its band 3 for more than price , seems much of the world cant use 160mhz on band 3 due to local regulations and 160mhz is limited to band 2 ch 36 to 49 , they could have put the 4 x 4 on band 2 however but most 3 band...

hi guys can someone confirm something for me here in australia ive been told we only have spectrum to operate 160MHz which is between CH36-CH64. so this would mean a tri band ax router would not be able to run 160Mhz if the 4 x 4 is on band 3 only i see the ax1100 has 4 x 4 on band 2 and...

agreed tim also agree , at least till OFDMA , mu-mimo and other ax feature are fully enabled and working they way they should

hi tim could that not be the case with your tests and conclusions in only using the intel wifi chipset that it may be causing the variations seen by the difference in router chipsets performance as its noticable all the broadcom chipset routers performed worse i know using the single client...

yes but does not track them , well as far as i know it doesnt when a router is converted to a pure ap

if its in AP mode the upstream router is controlling the connected clients and will show them in its connect client list as with most wireless routers set to ap mode all functionality is bypassed apart from its wifi

just a note here , both of the above are subscription based services

so without sounding obvious why change it out if its worked and is working perfectly and why buy a router to do an ap's job