Recent content by phibertron

are we talking about the wan port or a lan port on the router, for vlan 1? It might/should work

your welcome I don't think the dhcp idea is going to work, for 2 reasons 1. the access point is not on the 192.168.3.0 network 2. even if somehow the dhcp request did go through and an ip was assigned the client would not be able to communicate because of reason 1. you would have to...

once a switch is in L3 mode for intervlan routing, preventing L3 routing/traffic between vlans will have to be done with ACL's on the switch you will either have to implement dhcp relay on the switch to the dhcp server or put the dhcp server on a trunk of all needed vlans or use a...

from my experience, when doing this with consumer routers, it is just acting as a forwarder for the request, and no caching is involved. that's not say that it isn't, but it probably isn't.

Maybe it was a blessing in disguise that the router didn't work out https://supportforums.cisco.com/announcement/12338681/rv120w-and-rv220w-will-be-eol

Your Welcome Please let the forum know what you end up going with as I am sure others would like to know what other options exist for people wanting/needing to use the built in vpn clients on phones and tablets os's

It looks like QuickVPN is not an SSL VPN, probably using it for authentication Its an old thread, but tells us what ports it uses https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11332136/ports-used-quickvpn I think your only option is to use PPTP But in the scope of security, it would be...

I took a peek at the manual for the RV120 http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/routers/csbr/rv120w/administration/guide/rv120w_admin.pdf I find it odd that one would have to enable remote management for quickvpn which seems to unblock port 443, which suggest SSL So maybe quickvpn is...

From looking at the emulator for the device RV120W Wireless-N VPN Firewall Online Device Emulator If you look under VPN then IPSEC then VPN Users You notice that a user can authenticate using one of 3 protocols note: xauth is for IPsec pptp, xauth, quick vpn As I understand it, the...

Your Welcome Side note: If the EdgeMax 5 port router had a 4 port switch and not a 3 port switch I would have most likely gone with that router though I did look at the RV320

From the web interface under System Summary its shows cpu type The cpu is a Cavium CNS3410 as to what speed its running at, not sure, but here is the specs on the series http://www.cavium.com/pdfFiles/CNS3XXX_PB_Rev0.1.pdf If you look at the end of the pdf, it shows the possible variants

I'll need to go read through what people are calling laggy from a web interface perspective on the RV series I mainly use it for doing lab work, but here is my take on it - the device boots up quick enough - The web Interface seems to be ok, with exception sometimes you make a change...

I own an RV130, not sure what can be done from the web interface to figure it out? as there is no console access I bought one for its LACP abilities and its price http://forums.smallnetbuilder.com/showthread.php?p=147316#post147316

I ended up getting an RV130, the reason was based on cost The ERLite-3 was in the same price range as the RV130 but had no built in switch To get a built in switch I would have had to go with an ERLite-3 but it only has 3 switch ports not 4 Though I am still looking at the EdgeRouter...

my guess is that the routing table one Infra01 It shows 192.168.2 as being on Nic2 But in your diagram you show 192.168.2 as being on Nic3