Recent content by Seth Harman

He was right on the money. No idea how the permissions on those files got borked but I'm going to keep an eye on them going forward.

The RT-AX57 Go isn't the same device as the RT-BE58 Go that he's using.

I am currently running Entware and FlexQOS, vnStat, BACKUPMON, and spdMerlin in addition to YazDHCP. When I've removed YazDHCP completely as a test the other scripts continue to operate as normal. Unless someone is specifically aware of any of those scripts conflicting with YazDHCP I don't think...

Multiple machines, multiple browsers (Chrome, Edge, Firefox) all exhibiting the same behavior. Edge and Firefox have no addons, Chrome in Incognito Mode also the same result.

I'm not using any custom icons. I just now swapped the USB Key out and used BACKUPMON to put everything back onto a USB hard drive that's now plugged in. Doing a restore forces a router reboot and, sure enough, YazDHCP vanished from the DHCP Server tab again. So I did a force update and now it's...

It was either two or three revisions ago.

USB thumb drive.

I've been seeing some odd behavior from YazDHCP the last few versions. At random intervals the reference to YazDHCP will vanish from the LAN-DHCP Server tab, when it happens it will appear as if YazDHCP isn't even installed and show nothing for the reserved IP addresses. If I fire up AMTM and...

My VPN provider has a proprietary implementation of Wireguard that requires you to use their app, meaning you can't run it on a router unless it's one of a select group of routers that also support their proprietary firmware which would take the place of Merlin. So no, it's not strictly down to...

A lot of the major VPN providers don't have a Wireguard implementation you can use with Merlin but have a workable OpenVPN option.

Ok, thanks for clarifying, I wasn't sure if I was missing some odd case where that'd be necessary for your setup.

Ok, but again... the SPI firewall in use on your Asus router isn't going to allow a connection from a VLAN device back to a main LAN device unless there's a firewall rule in place that allows it and the firewall rule that allows main LAN -> VLAN is going to allow reciprocal communication from...

Sure, but unless you set the VLAN to operate on the same IP block as the main network and disabled AP isolation they already can't do that unless you've setup a firewall rule to allow such communication. By creating a rule to allow the main network devices to establish communications with...

I don't trust AI at all, but if there's a chance any firewall could misinterpret that rule you'd think the /netmask should be mandatory.

If you do a Google search on whether it's required or not its AI will give you this: "If a /32 is not used, firewalls may interpret a single IP (e.g., 192.168.1.5) incorrectly, sometimes defaulting to a /24 or the interface's broader subnet, leading to overly permissive rules." Really? A...