scredly
New Around Here
I work in the live performance industry (clubs/theatres/arenas). Many of our control networks run on private, secure wi-fi networks.
I have a question about the affect devices “pinging” or attempting to log on to secure wi-fi networks have on router performance.
Many advocate hiding the SSID to avoid these “pings” and connection attempts to preserve router resources.
I understand hiding SSDI can create it’s own set of issues and really offers no security benefits if using a secure network key but in the context of preserving router resources and avoiding these “pings” and connection attempts, does it hold any water? How much router processing power do these events actually use? Especially if tens, hundreds or even thousands (large theatres/arenas) of them are occurring during a show.
This policy has been promoted for years in our industry. I'd like to get the real story from folks with actual network expertise.
Thanks in advance for your replies.
I have a question about the affect devices “pinging” or attempting to log on to secure wi-fi networks have on router performance.
Many advocate hiding the SSID to avoid these “pings” and connection attempts to preserve router resources.
I understand hiding SSDI can create it’s own set of issues and really offers no security benefits if using a secure network key but in the context of preserving router resources and avoiding these “pings” and connection attempts, does it hold any water? How much router processing power do these events actually use? Especially if tens, hundreds or even thousands (large theatres/arenas) of them are occurring during a show.
This policy has been promoted for years in our industry. I'd like to get the real story from folks with actual network expertise.
Thanks in advance for your replies.