Hello,
I am working on setting up a laptop for my gradeschool children for school. I would like to use a relatively restricted DNS server for them and still keep my normal DNS settings for me.
I have tried to setup dnsmasq to have a separate group for the host, but unfortunately it does not seep to permit a seperate server= flag that is group based. Perhaps I am missing somthing?
I tried to setup a 2nd DNS only copy of dnsmasq, however even with adding an alias interface the 2nd config does not load because there is no way to unbind it from loopback. It seems that this is hard coded in the binary and specifying interface= or conversely excluding an interface does not do this.
My Plan B is to setup the particular hosts to send DNS directly to the upstream provider, however I was trying to avoid doing that because I have multiple DNS based network resources that I still wanted to work. Thus I am presently on Plan-C which would be a small separate linux vhost that is just serving this DNS. this seems a waste but may be appropriate.
Anyone dealt with this, Have ideas?
I am working on setting up a laptop for my gradeschool children for school. I would like to use a relatively restricted DNS server for them and still keep my normal DNS settings for me.
I have tried to setup dnsmasq to have a separate group for the host, but unfortunately it does not seep to permit a seperate server= flag that is group based. Perhaps I am missing somthing?
I tried to setup a 2nd DNS only copy of dnsmasq, however even with adding an alias interface the 2nd config does not load because there is no way to unbind it from loopback. It seems that this is hard coded in the binary and specifying interface= or conversely excluding an interface does not do this.
My Plan B is to setup the particular hosts to send DNS directly to the upstream provider, however I was trying to avoid doing that because I have multiple DNS based network resources that I still wanted to work. Thus I am presently on Plan-C which would be a small separate linux vhost that is just serving this DNS. this seems a waste but may be appropriate.
Anyone dealt with this, Have ideas?