cousinit99
New Around Here
Can anyone else confirm or corroborate this for me, please? I've run a port scan from multiple sites and all show port 80 as being open, despite all the usual suspects being tamped down. External UI access is disabled, insecure http LAN access disabled, port forwarding disabled, UPNP disabled, AICloud 2.0 disabled, no ports for any services configured for port 80 (even if they're disabled), and the Router Security Assessment is green across the board. I show the same anomaly on a second router as well, which is a RT-AC68U.
When I take one of the routers temporarily offline, the port scan shows that the port is no longer open because the host is no longer available to be scanned. This automatically rules out ISP equipment or involvement. The routers, themselves, have a port open on TCP 80, despite all UI configurations to the contrary. The port should not be open, or even reported closed. It should be stealth.
Based on my testing, versions 384.14_2 and 384.15 are also affected.
Fiddler returns "ReadResponse() failed: The server did not return a complete response for this request. Server returned 0 bytes" when attempting to connect to it, which to me means there is a service running and exposed to some degree.
This is highly concerning to me. Can I possibly get some corroboration, please? Is this a known issue already?
When I take one of the routers temporarily offline, the port scan shows that the port is no longer open because the host is no longer available to be scanned. This automatically rules out ISP equipment or involvement. The routers, themselves, have a port open on TCP 80, despite all UI configurations to the contrary. The port should not be open, or even reported closed. It should be stealth.
Based on my testing, versions 384.14_2 and 384.15 are also affected.
Fiddler returns "ReadResponse() failed: The server did not return a complete response for this request. Server returned 0 bytes" when attempting to connect to it, which to me means there is a service running and exposed to some degree.
This is highly concerning to me. Can I possibly get some corroboration, please? Is this a known issue already?
Last edited: