What's new
  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

NAS vs SAN

nawunder

New Around Here
Hi,

My wise friend encouraged me to ask for advise - better to get the opinion of the collective minds of geniuses than to blindly accept that of one.

I work for a very small actuarial firm. Before I began working there, they used a silo system - everyone working and storing their work on their individual computers. Our server was used to host our website and a store a few files and allow access to one another's computers. With my encouragement, we now store our work on the server so that it's centrally located for better accessibility. But the actually computing is still done on our systems - primarily quad-core computers with a decent amount of processor power and ram.

I'd like to see us move to a server version of our software so that the actual computing would be done on the server.

To upgrade, our techie has given us an estimate for a second server and a tower so that we can have a cluster environment. The main things we hope to gain with the upgrade is a system wherein if a server or hard drive goes down, we can maintain productivity until he can come in and service down part.

My question stems from the fact that I believe we are moving from a KIA to a Ferrari when a Lexus might suffice.

His bid for the server is the following:

HP Proliant ML350p G8 SQL Server
Twelve Core Processor
64 GB (8x4GB) 2Rx4 PC3 12800R-11 Memory, expandable to 192GB
HP 512 MB FBWC for P-Series Smart Array
8-bay hot plug Serial-attached SCSI (SAS) drive cage
Six (6) 300GB SAS 6G 10K rpm 2.5” Hot-Plug Hard Drives (1.2TB) – RAID5

The cost of this system is between 8 & 9K


Along with this he suggest a Drobo that is MS cluster enabled. Unfortunately, the only Drobo that fits that bill is a Drobo B1200i 12TB SAN Array. I can't imagine that we will ever be large enough to warrant a 12 bay storage system. Also, we do number crunching. My understanding is that a SAN array is intended for large companies where a lot of large files are being stored rapidly (such as call centers and hospitals). My limited research would indicate that we would do fine with a much smaller, less expensive NAS array as long as it is Windows Server 2012 or 2012RT compatible. The Drobo he suggested is approx $6K.

The software vendors recommendation for a server is basically that we have 1 or 2 GB per core and that the processor be either a
Xeon E5-2697 v2 2.70 GHz 12 cores or
Xeon E5-2695 v2 2.40 GHz 12 cores.

I would appreciate any suggestions anyone might have for building a system that will do a lot of number crunching (it can take a single user up to 10 hours to do a single run on a quad-core desktop) and offer us the protection of a cluster system without costing a full years salary of one of our students!! The full system suggested would cost approx 30K.

Thank you in advance,
Nancy
 
Why a server? User's apps stay on their computers, right? You just want the data files to go on a shared (NAS) mechanism.

Apps running on a server opens parandora's box of multi-user licensing and how to remote the displays, etc.

A simple 2 bay NAS is $175 plus cost of two drives, perhaps 2TB ea, at $75 ea.
Orders of magnitude simpler to setup than a windows server.

BUT, if the issue is the run time.. maybe you want a high end VM service from Amazon or Rackspace or elastichosts.com (my fav) where you pay by the time used. Total life cycle can be lower. No capital investment, up time and backups handled by them.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Support SNBForums w/ Amazon

If you'd like to support SNBForums, just use this link and buy anything on Amazon. Thanks!

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!
Back
Top