1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
Dismiss Notice

Welcome To SNBForums

SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.

If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!

While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!

Featured QNAP TS-332X Three Bay 10GbE NAS Reviewed

Discussion in 'QNAP' started by thiggins, Oct 22, 2018.

  1. thiggins

    thiggins Mr. Easy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Messages:
    13,602
    Last edited: Oct 22, 2018
  2. TheLostSwede

    TheLostSwede Regular Contributor

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2014
    Messages:
    128
    I'm actually quite surprised at how poor the 10Gbps performance is on all the 10Gbps products you've tested.

    Obviously tested differently, but this is what I get on my DIY NAS running OMV.

    NAS-performance.png
     
    Skeptical.me likes this.
  3. thiggins

    thiggins Mr. Easy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Messages:
    13,602
    Those numbers look way too high. Yes, test method matters a LOT.

    What do you get with a large Windows sequential file copy?
     
  4. TheLostSwede

    TheLostSwede Regular Contributor

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2014
    Messages:
    128
    This is from my PC to the NAS. Seemingly much faster than what you get with any of the branded boxes.

    upload_2018-10-25_2-19-48.png
     
  5. thiggins

    thiggins Mr. Easy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Messages:
    13,602
    Well, could be the ol' testbed is too slow. I am using a RAM-based drive to host the file.
     
  6. TheLostSwede

    TheLostSwede Regular Contributor

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2014
    Messages:
    128
    Well, sadly that's what happens, as gear gets faster and faster, so if you don't keep up, you fall behind without even noticing.
    Admittedly my hardware is all pretty top notch without going crazy. My main system is a Ryzen 1700 @ 4.85GHz with 16GB of RAM and a now "old" Plextor M8Peg SSD. Not cutting edge, but not too far off. To be honest, the NVMe drive doesn't make a huge difference in day to day tasks though.

    On the other hand, I'm quite pleased I built my own NAS, as it's working really well so far and it's much more up to date software wise than the retail brands. Obviously it lacks some of the functionality on offer from those companies, but most of what's on offer, is of little to no use for me. I've also had to learn a lot more Linux skills to deal with this thing, which is both a plus and minus.
     
  7. TheLostSwede

    TheLostSwede Regular Contributor

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2014
    Messages:
    128
    @thiggins Silly me, I have 16GB of RAM in the NAS, so this would explain why I get so high performance when dealing with "small" files.
    This is what I get once the data size exceeds the RAM size.
    Still not bad, but closer to the numbers you're getting in your testing.
    If nothing else, it proves you need plenty of RAM in your NAS to take advantage of 10Gbps Ethernet.

    upload_2018-10-28_18-31-48.png
     
  8. Rohan

    Rohan Occasional Visitor

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2015
    Messages:
    24
    Lots of RAM, a fast processor and SSD NAS drives ( or SSD tiering) are all needed to get the best out of a 10 GbE NAS. You also need a lot of NAS users or a PC with equivalent specs as the NAS to load a NAS up to the 10 GbE limit
     
    Skeptical.me likes this.
  9. sfx2000

    sfx2000 Part of the Furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    13,491
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    QNAP seems to really like these 3-bay RAID5 configurations lately...

    Would be curious to know what they're thinking there from a marketing perspective compared to 2-bay and 4-bay configurations...
     
  10. Skeptical.me

    Skeptical.me Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2016
    Messages:
    243
    Location:
    Australia
    4.85Ghz puts my TS-253Be to absolute shame. Thats the only thing that annoys me with the smaller, cheaper, QNAP NAS' ... the Celeron processors.