Recent content by AveAdvenae

Build RT-AC86U_386.3_alpha2-gd516f7b904 Looking good now, although I still can't get my head around some of the rule logic. If I add The Manchester device will be routed through OVPN5. However, if I add Then both Manchester and Huawei will be routed through OVPN1.

Yes, that's what I actually did - and it works since OPVN1 rules have higher priority than OPVN5 rules. Edit 1: No, it actually didn't work since "OpenVPN clients set to redirect all traffic have the highest priority." So my rule 192.168.1.24 - OVPN1 is over-ridden by 192.168.1.0/24 - OVPN5...

If I have two VPN clients running, OVPN1 and OVPN5, and I want all devices on the LAN to connect through OVPN1 except one device that should use OVPN5. Now I have one device, let's say 192.168.1.24, that should be routed through OVPN5. The only way I can achieve that seems to be to add each...

Testing 386.3_alpha2-gfdb13d8f24 DNS redirection in Exclusive mode works now! So far, so good, will continue testing.

The setting "Accept DNS Configuration" in VPN Client tab doesn't seem to work anymore. If I choose "Exclusive" there, the DNS requests are not routed to my VPN:s DNS server through the encrypted channel. Furthermore, if I choose "Disabled", then nothing is routed through the VPN! In VPN...

Ok, got it working now, but had to restore the RT-AC2900. After the restore I disabled DHCP and changed LAN IP to 192.168.100.1. After receiving a WAN address from the upstream EdgeRouter I added the following static route: Network/Host IP Netmask..........Gateway.....Interface...

1. Main router is an EdgeRouter X WAN: ..ip from ISP LAN: 192.168.1.1 2. WAN port of RT-AC2900 running Asuswrt-Merlin is connected to EdgeRouter. Both wireless channels enabled. WAN and NAT enabled, DHCP disabled. WAN: nothing LAN: 192.168.100.1 Only wireless clients connecting to RT-AC2900...

The solution that most VPN providers have implemented for now is to turn off compression. Yes, I know that in day-to-day use compression offers little benefit as much of the content is compressed already, but I can nevertheless notice an impact - depending on the visited sites of course. For...

In the last beta, 384.7_beta3, we now get useful info about DFS in the logs. Thank you! My own log with one client connected shows: Wireless 5 GHz SSID: XXXX_5GHz Mode: AP Noise: -87 dBm Channel: 108/80 BSSID: XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX DFS State: In-Service Monitoring(ISM) Time elapsed...