Recent content by b cheang

Thank you. I did a clean install (flashed, factory reset and restore) So far, it seems to be ok. Will continue to monitor

For those who loaded the beta FW, may i know which FW you came from and did you do a factory reset after flashing it? After flashing this beta, my BE88U (3006_102.2_2) GUI is very sluggish and not useable. Wireless clients cannot connect to 2.4G and 5G.

I did a dirty flash from 3006_102.2_2 on RT-BE88U and GUI of this beta firmware seems to be not responsive. All my Wireless 2.4G and 5G are not working. Reverted back to 3006_102.2_2 and restore my settings. Do I need to factory reset after upgrading to this beta fimrware and restore my settings?

Flash the 3006.102.2 Beta on my BE88U and not sure if this "bug" was reported. It seems the device name for all my connected 2.5Ghz devices "appear" the same. Anyone faced the same issue? Thank you

AC86U dirty upgrade to 386.3_2 from 386.3 and noticed the below log entry: Aug 8 10:25:59 kernel: protocol 0800 is buggy, dev eth5 It is repeating itself in the log. Any idea?

The issue happens when I connect directly to the any of ETH port of the RT-AC86U. Hence was wondering what could be difference.

Hi, When I boot/restart my pc, my internet is slow to establish a connection. It's not till like 30-40 seconds after I get to the desktop before the network connection gets establish. Did some troubleshooting and found out that if I connect directly one of the port on the 5 port GE switch...

Will try it the next time.

Thanks!

Is it ok to direct pihole upstream DNS to use DoT/DoH which I had in RT-AC86U running merlin 384.16? Appreciate advises. Many thanks in advance

Hi, Does that means that this issue will only be fixed in the next minor release? Thank you

Thanks. Will have a look at the script.

Hi, I have RT-AC86U on latest merlin FW 384.7. At the same time i have 2 x 1Gpbs connection from 2 diff ISPs. I have configured load-balancing ratio of 1:1 but when primary WAN goes down and come back up again, it seems all traffic still goes via secondary WAN (ETH 4). Does anyone faced the...

Ok. Which 3rd party DNS would you recommend then?

I had the same log message but i am pretty sure that Cloudfare (1.1.1.1) supports DNSSEC.... Am i missing something?