What's new
  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

Advice / Suggestions - Simple router: PPoE, Support Fixed IPs, Inbound connections...

glawrie

New Around Here
Until about a year ago we ran our FTTC connection using a Billion 7800 router. We have a /29 fixed IP block associated with the line, and used this to support connection to a couple of servers used for file storage / mail and so on. The Billion 7800 was able to handle this no problem at all.

The Billion 7800 started to go wrong concurrent with a change in Apple OS X Server policy (where they deprecated software firewall and suggested doing firewall in the router). Billion 7800 has limitations for firewall (not enough slots) and seemed to slow down when being used for firewall (though this might be simply because it was going wrong). So we looked around for an alternative.

Our ISP recommended the Draytek 2830. However this does not appear to be able to support routed IP assignments - you can set this up, but inter-LAN communication problem means the devices connected to the assigned IPs cannot 'see' each other through the router (which meant locally connected devices could not see the servers). Draytek were / are unable to fix this issue - but unclear why. They suggest running a complex solution involving IP aliasing against a NAT based configuration - which works but messes up our wireless LAN (on double NAT issues).

We asked around and someone else suggested the Cisco RV180. This has the inverse issue - works well in every respect (routed IPs, local IPs can see each other) but does not support inbound connections to the fixed IPs so assigned. This too seems to be a bonkers constraint of the 'does not compute' variety. But Cisco support assure me that the device is not able to support such inbound connections - only option apparently is to run it in NAT mode, and put the inbound server(s) in a DMZ - at which point you find the RV180 firewall does not apply to devices in the DMZ. This eliminates the RV180 as option (as we need a hardware firewall).

One option for us is to revert to using a Billion 7800 (for the PPoE, Fixed IP assignment) and running this through either the Draytek or the RV180 for firewall purposes. But I wonder if there is a router that would support our needs in one box... without having to buy some kind of rack-mounted enterprise class device...

So, any suggestions about how to resolve would be very helpful for us. Alternatively, if you have either a 2830 or RV180 and have it working in our configuration, perhaps you could let me know what config you used?

Thanks in advance!
 
I use a Ubiquiti Edgerouter. All their models use the same OS and have the same enterprise features (just number of ports is different). http://www.ubnt.com/edgemax#EdgeMAXhardware
These routers can do almost anything you want them to do, but some of the advanced stuff has to be done from the command line. Now routing, Vlans, NAT, Firewall, DNS, DHCP, ... can all be done from the GUI. If you want to know if it will work for you just post your scenario in the forum and it usually gets answered in less than an hour. http://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX/bd-p/EdgeMAX

I have been extremely happy with mine.
 
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
U Want to move away from Asus routers, Ubiquiti? advice needed Routers 78

Similar threads

Latest threads

Support SNBForums w/ Amazon

If you'd like to support SNBForums, just use this link and buy anything on Amazon. Thanks!

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!
Back
Top