NightmareTuga
Regular Contributor
I think not, is not possible
2025-10-25 12:14:17 switch[0]: <5> 02511002 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was up.
2025-10-25 12:14:14 switch[0]: <5> 02511001 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was down.
2025-10-25 12:14:12 switch[0]: <5> 02511002 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was up.
2025-10-25 12:14:05 switch[0]: <5> 02511001 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was down.
2025-10-25 12:14:02 switch[0]: <5> 02511002 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was up.
2025-10-25 12:13:59 switch[0]: <5> 02511001 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was down.
2025-10-25 12:13:41 switch[0]: <5> 02511002 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was up.
2025-10-25 12:13:38 switch[0]: <5> 02511001 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was down.
2025-10-25 12:13:36 switch[0]: <5> 02511002 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was up.
2025-10-25 12:13:29 switch[0]: <5> 02511001 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was down.
2025-10-25 12:13:18 switch[0]: <5> 02511002 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was up.
2025-10-25 12:13:14 switch[0]: <5> 02511001 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was down.
2025-10-25 12:13:12 switch[0]: <5> 02511002 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was up.
2025-10-25 12:13:05 switch[0]: <5> 02511001 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was down.
2025-10-25 12:13:02 switch[0]: <5> 02511002 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was up.
@sm11963, It may help to provide additional context if you include your router model and specific firmware version, along with any addon scripts you are running and if the affected device, if connected by WiFi, is on the main LAN WiFi or a Guest Network/Guest Network Pro WiFi profile.I wanted to report that this issue is still ongoing for my Apple TV 4k...
Updated my post.@sm11963, It may help to provide additional context if you include your router model and specific firmware version, along with any addon scripts you are running and if the affected device, if connected by WiFi, is on the main LAN WiFi or a Guest Network/Guest Network Pro WiFi profile.
@sm11963, Do you have an Asus router? If so, is it running Asus-Merlin firmware?Updated my post.
No additional addon scripts that would affect this, nothing running on the router or apple tv that I am aware of. And I believe this problem is only for ethernet, the Apple TV is connected directly to the router with ethernet.
Man what are the odds, I just updated on 10/14 when I initially noticed this, and an update is released a few days later....There is a newer firmware for that model.
ER605 | Omada Gigabit VPN Router | Omada Network Support
support.omadanetworks.com
2025-10-26 13:10:59 switch[0]: <5> 02511002 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was up.
2025-10-26 13:10:55 switch[0]: <5> 02511001 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was down.
2025-10-26 13:10:54 switch[0]: <5> 02511002 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was up.
2025-10-26 13:10:51 switch[0]: <5> 02511001 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was down.
2025-10-26 13:10:50 switch[0]: <5> 02511002 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was up.
2025-10-26 13:10:47 switch[0]: <5> 02511001 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was down.
2025-10-26 13:10:32 switch[0]: <5> 02511002 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was up.
2025-10-26 13:10:30 switch[0]: <5> 02511001 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was down.
2025-10-26 13:10:19 switch[0]: <5> 02511002 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was up.
2025-10-26 13:10:16 switch[0]: <5> 02511001 [OMADA][osg:34-60-F9-5D-E1-75]: The physical connection status of [WAN5] was down.
I wanted to report that this issue is still ongoing for my Apple TV 4k... and I was not successful in resolving the constant up/down logging issue with a static IP address unfortunately.
Apple should be releasing TVOS 26.1 in the next few weeks. I don’t know if a new release will help but one can hope.Man what are the odds, I just updated on 10/14 when I initially noticed this, and an update is released a few days later....
Doesn't matter, I don't think there is an issue with the router. Given all the evidence, it seems pretty clear this is an issue with how the Apple TV is managing its connection.
I updated my router. Updated my post with the updated firmware. Power cycled the router and apple tv. Still having the issue:
Not Cat 7. True Cat 7 was never an accepted standard and its physical construction may cause compatibility issues. As far as I can see @sm11963's box only has a gigabit socket therefore the appropriate cable would be Cat 5e which supports up to 2.5Gb. Alternatively he could use Cat 6 or Cat 6A.You need to use a new Ethernet cable at least a Cat 7. Why? I suspect that there may be a autonegotiation issue between the devices.
“Category 7 was ratified as a standard in 2002 as per the ISO/IEC 11801, but still is not recognized by EIA or TIA.” https://intellinetsolutions.com/pages/ethernet-cable-guideNot Cat 7. True Cat 7 was never an accepted standard and its physical construction may cause compatibility issues. As far as I can see @sm11963's box only has a gigabit socket therefore the appropriate cable would be Cat 5e which supports up to 2.5Gb. Alternatively he could use Cat 6 or Cat 6A.
Exactly my point. As that article says, "Best to be avoided" and "Realistically, Cat6a is your better choice as it is a supported official standard, and you can be assured of quality and data integrity."“Category 7 was ratified as a standard in 2002 as per the ISO/IEC 11801, but still is not recognized by EIA or TIA.” https://intellinetsolutions.com/pages/ethernet-cable-guide
Agreed, quality is the key. Cat 6 or higher is usually unnecessary for gigabit connections unless you're using very long runs in a noisy RF environment (e.g. industrial). Good quality Cat 5e is usually all that's needed in a home, but Cat 6 is fine as well.The point was to get a quality Ethernet cable Cat 6 or higher. Cat 8 may be excessive.

Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!