What's new

Solved Bandwidth degrades from AIMesh node to AIMesh router (ethernet backhaul)

  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

adzel

New Around Here
I noticed that when passing traffic from the AImesh node to the Aimesh router. My bandwidth drops. I thought it was the media converter. I already swapped out a working media converter and it's still the same. I confirmed that all media converters can give 1gbps when connected to the LAN port of the AIMESH NODE.

I'm not sure if this is expected but I'm planning to connect my Asus 56v2 ethernet backhaul to Asus 68u lan port. . I'm afraid my speed will get halved again from ax56v2 to 88u. Ignore the powerline connection. It's a workaround till the fiber connection is set up.

afrrai
SETUP


Modem
| |
Asus 88u (386.7_2)
| |
| |
| |---- > ethernet backhaul (Lan port) ->> Media converter ->> fiber ->> Media converter -->>ethernet - asus 68u (386.7_2)
| ------ > ethernet backhaul (Lan port) ->> Powerline ->> Powerline ->> ethernet -asus ax56u v2 (ignore this node)



LAN to LAN port of Aimesh NODE asus 68u
Connecting to host X.X.X.120, port 5201
[ 4] local X.X.X.119 port 61264 connected to X.X.X.120 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 112 MBytes 939 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 113 MBytes 949 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 113 MBytes 948 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 113 MBytes 948 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 113 MBytes 949 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 113 MBytes 948 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 113 MBytes 949 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 113 MBytes 949 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 113 MBytes 949 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 113 MBytes 946 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.10 GBytes 947 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.10 GBytes 947 Mbits/sec receiver


LAN to WAN PORT of AI mesh node asus 68u

Connecting to host X.X.X.253, port 5201
[ 4] local X.X.X.119 port 61361 connected to X.X.X.253 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 34.5 MBytes 289 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 52.5 MBytes 439 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 51.1 MBytes 430 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 51.6 MBytes 432 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 51.1 MBytes 430 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 47.0 MBytes 394 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 56.0 MBytes 470 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 51.9 MBytes 434 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 45.0 MBytes 378 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 52.2 MBytes 438 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 493 MBytes 414 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 493 MBytes 413 Mbits/sec receiver

Lan port of AImesh node asus 68u to WAN port of AImesh router Asus 88u

Connecting to host X.X.X.254, port 5201
[ 4] local X.X.X.119 port 61352 connected to X.X.X.254 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 25.4 MBytes 212 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.01 sec 33.6 MBytes 281 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.01-3.01 sec 29.8 MBytes 248 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.01-4.00 sec 31.8 MBytes 269 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 32.6 MBytes 273 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 34.1 MBytes 286 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 29.4 MBytes 247 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 31.2 MBytes 262 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.00-9.01 sec 31.0 MBytes 259 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 9.01-10.00 sec 32.2 MBytes 271 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 311 MBytes 261 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 310 MBytes 260 Mbits/sec receiver
 
great that you are using iperf for the testing. It's a good start :)

i also think good to take the 'media converters' out of the picture for the testing.

I have no idea what firmware you are using on both main router and nodes - this is important - as there are some firmwares that had an issue with connections speeds being poor. you might be able to find them if you search the forum

i'm not sure about each of the scenarios you are testing but this is what i would do for testing.

Get setup and baseline:
install latest stock installed on your node
install latest firmware (stock or merlin) on main router
use a pc/nas connected to lan port of main router for iperf server (not iperf on router as it is not very consistent)
run a lan iperf test (e.g. from a laptop connected to lan port) baseline test to establish max lan network speed to iperf server - this is the max and a test of stable connectiton main router

Test 1 - node to router (all lan directly connected)
node connected wired direct from lan port of router to wan of node
test client connected to lan port of node
run iperf test

Test 2 - node to router (all lan connected through ethernet/powerline/etc)
node connected wired over ethernet cable/powerline/etc from router to wan of node
test client connected to lan port of node
run iperf test

etc...
 
Thanks for the feedback.
great that you are using iperf for the testing. It's a good start :)

i also think good to take the 'media converters' out of the picture for the testing.

I have no idea what firmware you are using on both main router and nodes - this is important - as there are some firmwares that had an issue with connections speeds being poor. you might be able to find them if you search the forum

i'm not sure about each of the scenarios you are testing but this is what i would do for testing.

Get setup and baseline:
install latest stock installed on your node
install latest firmware (stock or merlin) on main router
use a pc/nas connected to lan port of main router for iperf server (not iperf on router as it is not very consistent)
run a lan iperf test (e.g. from a laptop connected to lan port) baseline test to establish max lan network speed to iperf server - this is the max and a test of stable connectiton main router

Test 1 - node to router (all lan directly connected)
node connected wired direct from lan port of router to wan of node
test client connected to lan port of node
run iperf test

Test 2 - node to router (all lan connected through ethernet/powerline/etc)
node connected wired over ethernet cable/powerline/etc from router to wan of node
test client connected to lan port of node
run iperf test

etc...
Thanks for the feedback. I will be installing firmware 386.7_2 on both ac882 and ac682. Then use Cat 6 to test your recommendation.
 
Lol. I replaced all the cables with Cat6 issue seems to be fixed. The cat5e wires seem to be worn out bad. I just remembered that I recycled these cables from 6 years ago. This is my iperf result btw.

LAN port 1 from AIMESH NODE to Lan port 1 AIMESH router
Connecting to host x.x.x.120, port 5201
[ 5] local x.x.x.125 port 52628 connected to x.x.x.120 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 110 MBytes 920 Mbits/sec 0 365 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 110 MBytes 921 Mbits/sec 0 382 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 110 MBytes 922 Mbits/sec 0 382 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 110 MBytes 922 Mbits/sec 0 382 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 109 MBytes 912 Mbits/sec 0 382 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 109 MBytes 918 Mbits/sec 0 382 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 110 MBytes 919 Mbits/sec 0 382 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 110 MBytes 925 Mbits/sec 0 382 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 110 MBytes 921 Mbits/sec 0 382 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 109 MBytes 918 Mbits/sec 0 382 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.07 GBytes 920 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.07 GBytes 918 Mbits/sec receiver

iperf Done.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on 5201 (test #1)
-----------------------------------------------------------

LAN port 1 from AIMESH router to LAN port 1 AIMESH node
Accepted connection from x.x.x.125, port 52612
[ 5] local x.x.x.120 port 5201 connected to x.x.x.125 port 52628
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 108 MBytes 906 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 110 MBytes 922 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 110 MBytes 919 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 110 MBytes 919 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 109 MBytes 917 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 110 MBytes 920 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 110 MBytes 919 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 110 MBytes 919 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 110 MBytes 920 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 109 MBytes 918 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 10.00-10.00 sec 58.0 KBytes 806 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.07 GBytes 918 Mbits/sec receiver
-----------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on 5201 (test #2)
-----------------------------------------------------------
^Ciperf3: interrupt - the server has terminated
 
Results look good to me using ethernet backhaul.

If you had the node wireless backhaul (like me) you would not get such good result :)

also worth testing a client connected wireless to main AP (from approx 2m away) and same test when connected to the node
 
Lol. I replaced all the cables with Cat6 issue seems to be fixed. The cat5e wires seem to be worn out bad. I just remembered that I recycled these cables from 6 years ago.
a simple cable swap, that's all it took? (are you sure they were cat5e and not just cat5? they dont relly "wear out," but if a termination fails on a pair, your speeds will suffer- this is why people are changing to fibre, which passes signal at speed or simply doesn't...)
 

Similar threads

Latest threads

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!
Top