Just taking the temperature here. I stopped being interested in WiMax a few years ago when it became bogged down and seemed like it wasn't going anywhere.
The recent hoo-hah with the Xohm Baltimore rollout, nonwithstanding, I still haven't changed my opinion. I just don't see anyone being able to make the investment to put the infrastructure in place on a widespread basis.
It might find a niche in campus applications, or in countries that don't have an existing broadband infrastructure. But the pitch that it will be used to provide broadband to rural areas just doesn't wash. Maybe in the midwest prairies, but not in mountainous / hilly areas like I live in. And rural is always the last to be served because the population density and uptake just doesn't pay without some sort of subsidy.
I just don't ever see it being a viable alternative to cellular 3G (or 3.5 or 4). If cell carriers are having a hard time financing system wide rollouts of high speed data service, how the hell is someone else going to?
The recent hoo-hah with the Xohm Baltimore rollout, nonwithstanding, I still haven't changed my opinion. I just don't see anyone being able to make the investment to put the infrastructure in place on a widespread basis.
It might find a niche in campus applications, or in countries that don't have an existing broadband infrastructure. But the pitch that it will be used to provide broadband to rural areas just doesn't wash. Maybe in the midwest prairies, but not in mountainous / hilly areas like I live in. And rural is always the last to be served because the population density and uptake just doesn't pay without some sort of subsidy.
I just don't ever see it being a viable alternative to cellular 3G (or 3.5 or 4). If cell carriers are having a hard time financing system wide rollouts of high speed data service, how the hell is someone else going to?