Hi,
I'm looking to update my wifi network and I'm trying to understand the performance differences between mesh (eero, Orbi etc) and AP based solutions. All the comparisons I can find are between different mesh systems OR different AP systems. No one appears to have compared the two different approaches. What, for example, is the coverage and throughput of a two node Netgear Orbi (RBK50) solution and one with 2 Netgear AP's? Just using Netgear as an example, other makes are available.
When I look at the throughput and attenuation graphs in the individual reviews done by SNB (Great work by the way) it looks like the better mesh systems wipe the floor with AP's. They offer greater throughput that's sustained as attenuation increases. Is this true? I can buy five Netgear AP's for the same price as the two node RBK50 system, which solution would be best?
The second area of question is the wider network integration. For example, I want to offer guest network capability and to use VLAN to separate this traffic from the local network. Some of the mesh solutions support VLANs but only if you use the supplied router functionality and all the descriptions of application are limited to IPTV support. I don't want to use the router functionality as I already have firewall router and VPN capability. This is well supported by AP's and "sort of in a poorly documented way" in some mesh solutions.
How about it SmallNetBuilder? How about a comparison of mesh and AP based solutions including performance and network integration is a real life SME environment? I think that would be really valuable.
Cheers,
I'm looking to update my wifi network and I'm trying to understand the performance differences between mesh (eero, Orbi etc) and AP based solutions. All the comparisons I can find are between different mesh systems OR different AP systems. No one appears to have compared the two different approaches. What, for example, is the coverage and throughput of a two node Netgear Orbi (RBK50) solution and one with 2 Netgear AP's? Just using Netgear as an example, other makes are available.
When I look at the throughput and attenuation graphs in the individual reviews done by SNB (Great work by the way) it looks like the better mesh systems wipe the floor with AP's. They offer greater throughput that's sustained as attenuation increases. Is this true? I can buy five Netgear AP's for the same price as the two node RBK50 system, which solution would be best?
The second area of question is the wider network integration. For example, I want to offer guest network capability and to use VLAN to separate this traffic from the local network. Some of the mesh solutions support VLANs but only if you use the supplied router functionality and all the descriptions of application are limited to IPTV support. I don't want to use the router functionality as I already have firewall router and VPN capability. This is well supported by AP's and "sort of in a poorly documented way" in some mesh solutions.
How about it SmallNetBuilder? How about a comparison of mesh and AP based solutions including performance and network integration is a real life SME environment? I think that would be really valuable.
Cheers,