Ports 135 and 145 not stealth

[Mister2088]

I forgive me if this has been discussed before. Shields up shows these as closed but not stealth. Should I be concerned? If so, should I add a couple of iptables commands to drop in the firewall-start jffs/scripts ?
Any sample script would be appreciated. Thanks
BTW on 386.4

 

[ColinTaylor]

Those ports are not exposed by the router to the internet. Therefore it's almost certainly a false positive caused by your ISP blocking those ports.

P.S. Are you sure it's ports 135 and 145 and not the more commonly blocked 139 and 445?

 

[Mister2088]

Those ports are not exposed by the router to the internet. Therefore it's almost certainly a false positive caused by your ISP blocking those ports.

P.S. Are you sure it's ports 135 and 145 and not the more commonly blocked 139 and 445?

Thx. Then nothing to worry about. Yes I mistyped it is 445 not 145.
Now would it hurt if I did a DROP for these in firewall-start?

 

[ColinTaylor]

Now would it hurt if I did a DROP for these in firewall-start?

It would be pointless as there is already a DROP rule for all incoming ports that aren't specifically allowed.