What's new

Which WD RED is better for WD my Cloud

  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

nf24eg

New Around Here
Hello, I bought WD my cloud PR4100 16GB Ram diskless,
now I look to buy disks my target was 2 tb But I got confused that WD Red have differences like
The Cache memory are from 64 to 256
the RPM 5400 or 7200
SMR or CMR
I don't want to pay for something that won't make a difference ..

I was plan to buy WD Red 2tb but I found that it is 64 Cache, 5400 RPM (and I will try to get the CMR)
or is it better to go for a higher cache
WD Red 4tb 265 Cache, 5400 Rpm CMR ?

or the PRO will make a huge difference by the 7200RPM .. because this will change my plans totally since WD don't have 2tb 7200 RPM

so may someone guide me what may effect the performance
I'm going to use RAID 10 or RAID 5
 
Last edited:
Avoid the SMR Reds. They're usually indicated with EFAX in the product name
 
so I still have the options
2tb 5400 RPM with 64 cache
or
4tb 5400 RPM with 265 cache ?
and if I will go for 4tb, shall I take 5400 RPM or 7200
I know what is higher is better, but I don't know about that on the NAS, and if it will make a difference or not .. I have 16GB ram .. I also not sure if there is a connection or not
 
most Reds spin at 5400 RPM and the 7200 RPMs ones generate more heat than the former. Cache is not that important for a NAS. I'd go for the 4TB one
 
I have bought two Synology NAS. The first was for home use and the "package" I bought came with WD Red 4 TB drives (5400 RPM). The drives were CMR. The second NAS came with WD Red 4 TB, 5400 RPM, SMR drives. Honestly I found no difference in performance between the CMR and SMR drives in the Synology NAS.

My reading tells me that while many are complaining about the SMR drives they will only give you problems with some of the "advanced" file systems such as ZFS. Might be best, however, if you have a choice to go with the CMR drives.

As for the RPM, the 5400's should do just fine in most NAS devices. They also run at a lower temp and use less energy than a 7200 RPM drive.

Go with the WD Red and buy more storage than you think you will need. Two 4 TB drives mirrored will store a lot of videos and pictures! Seagate Ironwolf drives are supposed to be good unless you do not like the Seagate brand (I have had terrible results/reliability with Seagate)
 
Hello, I bought WD my cloud PR4100 16GB Ram diskless,
now I look to buy disks my target was 2 tb But I got confused that WD Red have differences like
The Cache memory are from 64 to 256
the RPM 5400 or 7200
SMR or CMR
I don't want to pay for something that won't make a difference ..

I was plan to buy WD Red 2tb but I found that it is 64 Cache, 5400 RPM (and I will try to get the CMR)
or is it better to go for a higher cache
WD Red 4tb 265 Cache, 5400 Rpm CMR ?

or the PRO will make a huge difference by the 7200RPM .. because this will change my plans totally since WD don't have 2tb 7200 RPM

so may someone guide me what may effect the performance
I'm going to use RAID 10 or RAID 5

I can't speak to the NAS application, but given you want WD Red (I also prefer WD HDDs), I would compare their Pro and non-Pro specs for the capacity you want, and consider the drive with faster RPM, faster access rate, larger cache, and longer warranty... within your budget.

Me, I'd get the 7200 RPM Pro drive with 5-year warranty. Or consider a possibly less expensive but still comparably spec'd Black drive (or whatever model color this might be).

Also compare acoustic noise... sometimes the larger capacity drives are noisier, so may be a consideration.

This approach typically yields the sweet spot choice since there are not too many options to begin with.

WD Red Pro: https://documents.westerndigital.co...duct-brief-western-digital-wd-red-pro-hdd.pdf

WD Red Plus: https://documents.westerndigital.co...uct-brief-western-digital-wd-red-plus-hdd.pdf

WD Red: https://documents.westerndigital.co.../product-brief-western-digital-wd-red-hdd.pdf

Closing point... HDD can be re-purposed later on, so you may or may not choose to spec them out more generously.

Edit: Fixed the data sheet links.

OE
 
Last edited:
Unless the NAS is servicing a half a dozen to a dozen users concurrently, 5400RPM drives are more than fast enough. With multiple drives working together, drive speeds are not as important as when a single drive is being considered.

You do not want SMR drives. Ever. :)


The best price to capacity ratio right now is an 8TB WD RED when it goes on sale. The 'Pro' drives do not last any longer, nor are they worth the extra cost in the long term.

Lower temps, lower prices and higher capacities (by allowing you to buy 'up' if your budget allows) make the WD CMR RED drives a good buy.
 
most Reds spin at 5400 RPM and the 7200 RPMs ones generate more heat than the former. Cache is not that important for a NAS. I'd go for the 4TB one
If cache is not important i would then go for 2tb which is 64 cache and the rpm is 5400 .. but if its not that important why they make this variety, if 7200 make more heat then because my device is small i would go for 5400 .. But wd said that Reds is for cooling !!
Thats why its all confusing me
 
Confusing yes.
But for a Network Attached Storage go for the WD Red Plus 3.5". Will do what you need.

See: https://www.westerndigital.com/products/internal-drives/wd-red-hdd

Note: Red Plus is the new name for the Red drives with CMR technology. CMR is what you want. Use the 5400 RPM drives. Plenty of info on the web comparing SMR and CMR
 
I have bought two Synology NAS. The first was for home use and the "package" I bought came with WD Red 4 TB drives (5400 RPM). The drives were CMR. The second NAS came with WD Red 4 TB, 5400 RPM, SMR drives. Honestly I found no difference in performance between the CMR and SMR drives in the Synology NAS.

My reading tells me that while many are complaining about the SMR drives they will only give you problems with some of the "advanced" file systems such as ZFS. Might be best, however, if you have a choice to go with the CMR drives.

As for the RPM, the 5400's should do just fine in most NAS devices. They also run at a lower temp and use less energy than a 7200 RPM drive.

Go with the WD Red and buy more storage than you think you will need. Two 4 TB drives mirrored will store a lot of videos and pictures! Seagate Ironwolf drives are supposed to be good unless you do not like the Seagate brand (I have had terrible results/reliability with Seagate)
SMR isnt noticeable until the drive starts filling up AND it has to rewrite populated blocks to reshingle them. That's when the write latency goes through the roof.
 
This post about WD misrepresenting the HDD RPM spec is timely:


I wonder what this means to the build construction when they run a "5400 RPM Class" drive at 7200 RPM. Presumably the acoustic noise, power consumption, construction, and warranty remain at '5400 RPM Class' as spec'd... less than those of 7200 RPM Class; so what's the point... why not just call it a lessor built 7200 RPM drive. Puzzling... the answer must come down to money.

I'm still blissfully partial to 7200 RPM Class and it's stronger specs and warranty (promise of durability) despite the noise/power/heat cost. But then I have not operated a NAS. A NAS in my home would mostly sleep! :)

OE
 
Last edited:
Power consumption and noise according to the Techreport article was actually much higher than a 5400 RPM drive from both Seagate or WD, so I’m not sure what RPM Class fully entails. Maybe, we get the worst of both worlds, power draw of a 7200 RPM drive at the performance of a 5400 RPM drive lol?
 
Last edited:
Now I would like to make Raid 10 so I need at least 4 hdd,
will it be slow if I used 3 hdd WD Red 4tb CMR + 1 hdd WD Red 4tb SMR ?
 
Now I would like to make Raid 10 so I need at least 4 hdd,
will it be slow if I used 3 hdd WD Red 4tb CMR + 1 hdd WD Red 4tb SMR ?

Good question; I wouldn't do it. Not sure if the controller would freak out and throw a error if the i/o to one drive wrote normally and the same i/o to the other slowed down to reshingle a series of blocks.
 
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
A Active(!) x16 PCIe 4 (or better) NVMe add-on card sought General NAS Discussion 2

Similar threads

Latest threads

Support SNBForums w/ Amazon

If you'd like to support SNBForums, just use this link and buy anything on Amazon. Thanks!

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!
Top