System Error Message
Part of the Furniture
to get more bandwidth you can bond 2 ethernet ports (WAN and LAN) to get up to 2Gb/s to test wifi.
Looking at the article posted to today on SNB, even though not a flow blown test the 88 doesn't look like anything special. Just looks average.
AWESOME, thank you!
i knew that the max numbers for RT-AC56U documented by tim were incorrect.....
now i dont know what to trust at all, because i agree that 600mbps+ is possible on 2x2 AC but some tests are showing 3x3 and 4x4 devices not getting that high
I would imagine if i test R7000 on 3x3 ac to get 750+mbps
to get more bandwidth you can bond 2 ethernet ports (WAN and LAN) to get up to 2Gb/s to test wifi.
That seems a bit silly.I just saw that and cancelled my order. I'll stick with my 68P for another year.
anybody have ipv6 issue with this router, my previous router rt-ac87r working fine with ipv6 but after i swapped out with this router i can't get ipv6 address anymore, when i try testing with dualstack ipv4/ipv6 i'm only get ipv4 no link on ipv6.
I know 802.11n improved on MAC efficiency. By that 802.11ac benefits as well. I can't find an academic paper to see a rigid proof for 802.11n nor 802.11ac. If someone could point me to one, i would be grateful. The number that the CISCO whitepaper quoted is about 70%.
Looking at the article posted to today on SNB, even though not a flow blown test the 88 doesn't look like anything special. Just looks average.
after experienced the issue i have to deal with the rt-ac87 throughout it life i don't trust the design with combined chipset anymore, although this time just a realtek switch but i'll probably return mine and will get either the 3100 or 5300.All, so quick question, I know on paper the only difference between the AC3100 and AC88u appears to be the extra 4 ports and associated chipset/controller for them. I have an AC3100 right now and am thinking of adding a 2nd unit but instead doing the AC88u. What seems a little odd is that the AC3100 reviews seem great and AC88u not so much, am I missing something here or are they indeed the same unit and should not have any particular AC88u related issues not already seen on the AC3100 ? Thanks
What seems a little odd is that the AC3100 reviews seem great and AC88u not so much, am I missing something here or are they indeed the same unit and should not have any particular AC88u related issues not already seen on the AC3100 ? Thanks
Is it even worth it to go from an 87u if its working to the AC3100 or 88u?
Most people are upgrading because of the 87U issues with the FW and that's all.
After all the issues I had it just felt "dirty" so I had to sell it. I know it's completely unreasonable and the hardware itself was actually quite good with questionable wireless drivers/sdk. But for me and I guess a lot of people once hardware fails you and there's a nice new shiny box to replace it (without the Quantenna chip), the urge becomes to much to ignore. Especially if you can afford it.Most people are upgrading because of the 87U issues with the FW and that's all.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!