red_pope
Regular Contributor
sfx2000, I'll just have to agree to disagree. I see where you are coming from and everything you say is absolutely correct. I just think that the edge cases are less edge than you seem to indicate. Plenty of people on there and else where have mentioned adding higher gain rubber ducks on their routers and greatly improved wifi within their house. I've tested a bunch of setups and I generally see improved Wifi, especially in 5GHz. I am sure there are PLENTY of setups where it would make it worse. There might even be setups where someone thinks they've improved things, but most clients are actually suffering, except maybe it improved things in the really bad spots, which is what they needed and some performance being sacrafied in areas where things were fine is okay.
Overlapping channels or abutting channels can be a big problem. Especially in areas where there are a lot of basestations, business/enterprise/urban/dense suburban are probably all not good places for higher gain antennas. Then again, if you are restricting to 5GHz operation or primarily 5GHz operation focused, because of the poorer penetration, higher gain antennas might be very viable in most of those setups.
It is all about designing the entire setup to use what you have. Have higher gain antennas? You probably need to reduce basestation density to prevent interference gain.
My setup is fairly linear and I have no nearby neighbors to produce meaningful interference. I have my router on one side of my house, and AP close to the other side of my house a floor up and on non-overlapping channels and I have an outdoor AP on my garage the furthest from my router on the same channels as my router. It is almost a straight line rather than a triangle for the basestation setup. So the levels of interference each one can produce in the other is minimal at best with received signal levels generally being 40-50dB lower cochannel between the basestations that could interfere with each other. So a couple dB more gain could be good. In my case with lots of testing, including running wireless clients on the adjacent APs to generate potential noise, I found that going from 3 to 5dBi on my Archer C8 and 5 to 7dBi on my Archer C5 and WDR3600 all produced meaningful levels of 5GHz increased performance. 2.4GHz has been minimal across all of them, but there are slightly gains at long to extreme range on the order of 5% or so. 5GHz sees some pretty good increases generally in the 20% range on the 11ac basestations at most distances and the 11n sees those kind of gains at medium range and longer (nothing at short range).
Sure, most people are not going to test. Or do minimal testing. A lot of people are not going to have the setup where they might benefit from things. Some people are going to get total crap antennas. Since they are generally so cheap, I am going to keep buying one up (~+2dBi) antennas for my routers/APs and testing with them whenever I get a new router to play with. Worst comes to worst I wasted maybe $10-15 and a couple of hours of my time.
azazel1024
The reason I did asked you, was because, there is a 3 floor house, 5 bedroom, 1 kitchen, 1 loft, 1 studio, 1 huge basement, including a detach double car port, that a close friends of mines bought recently.
The house is 50 years old and basically is going to be renovated in full. I personally told my friend, this is the time when you plan your LAN, Phone bank and CCTV networks. Like your Electrical Grid and plumbing, blue prints!
You choose where and how you want it, all you need is too install all the different cabling required.
When he mention fiber optical, That was a bit elaborated.
I already knew about the multimedia converts and the different techniques. The house is 4500 square foot home.
Buying the required equipment is another story. He's house and budget. In the mean time I just keep reading and minding my business.
Last edited: