Dismiss Notice

Welcome To SNBForums

SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.

If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!

While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!

WD Live 2TB Speed Expectations

Discussion in 'General NAS Discussion' started by RobUCF, Dec 31, 2012.

  1. RobUCF

    RobUCF New Around Here

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages:
    2
    I got an 2TB WDL drive for x-mas, upon setting it up and use Lan test to benchmark the speeds I am a bit disappointed, but after read the WDL forums and some Google research my expectations may be too high, please let me know, config is as follows:

    Wireless N network
    WNDR 3700 router

    Computer 1 connected at 150Mbps, I get transfer rates ~3.5 Mb/s
    Computer 2 connected at 300Mbps, I get transfer rates ~7 Mb/s

    Are those slow or normal given I am wireless?

    I have tried a ton of troubleshooting but nothing really helps. The only thing I have not done is SSH into the WDL and make conf changes as some posts on the WDL forums suggested -- there is no one consistent setting change it's all over the place. Before I go this route wanted to see if my expectations are too high I was hoping wireless to get ~10Mb/s or more.

    Anyhow let me know, appreciate the feedback.
     
  2. thiggins

    thiggins Mr. Easy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Messages:
    10,694
    Assuming your rates are in MegaBytes/sec, not Megabits, the throughputs aren't unreasonable.

    Have you benchmarked wired transfers?

    What is the distance between wireless client and router?
     
  3. RobUCF

    RobUCF New Around Here

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Messages:
    2
    Yes that is in MegaBytes/sec. The client and router are 10 feet apart or so in a different room. Should the rates be higher or is that "normal".
     
  4. thiggins

    thiggins Mr. Easy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Messages:
    10,694
    I would say the results aren't surprising.

    Run Ethernet-based transfers to see what the maximum possible performance is.
     
  5. stevech

    stevech Part of the Furniture

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2010
    Messages:
    6,925
    Location:
    San Diego
    Big file transfers via WiFi... always a small fraction of the data rate that a wired 10/100/1000 connection can provide. Best rate you will see is transferring one big file, like 500MB. Better yet, two transfers concurrently, even on same (fast) PC; you'll see the sum of the two is markedly faster than one stream- due to overhead in all parts of the software and WiFi. Even better if two PCs, one big transfer each.

    Wireless = convenience and mobility, not performance!
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2012

Share This Page