Why not post the original source rather than a reprint by a news aggregator site? I assume the first instance you saw was the Bleeping Computer article. I see that article has been updated with a response from Cloudflare.This is the second time I have seen this posted.
Update 10/4 - A Cloudflare spokesperson has sent BleepingComputer the following comment regarding Certitude's report:
In our analysis, we found that the firm's findings would have required a customer to disable certain default security configurations on their Cloudflare account and their origin.
Even in this instance, any such abuse can be prevented through the use of custom certificates to manage the communications between Cloudflare and their origin server (e.g. website), or by utilizing Cloudflare Tunnels to communicate from the origin to Cloudflare.
I think the preceding sentence is the important part, "would have required a customer to disable certain default security configurations on their Cloudflare account and their origin". Which sounds to me like "If you're stupid enough to do this then...". But I'm not one of their customers so what do I know."Even in this instance, any such abuse can be prevented through the use of ..."
I don't know how to take that. It sounds like they are giving an excuse of 'well, you could do this or that, but only if you know about it, and it may cost extra $$ ... we have bugs but there are ways to work around them'.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.