Why not post the original source rather than a reprint by a news aggregator site? I assume the first instance you saw was the Bleeping Computer article. I see that article has been updated with a response from Cloudflare.This is the second time I have seen this posted.
Update 10/4 - A Cloudflare spokesperson has sent BleepingComputer the following comment regarding Certitude's report:
In our analysis, we found that the firm's findings would have required a customer to disable certain default security configurations on their Cloudflare account and their origin.
Even in this instance, any such abuse can be prevented through the use of custom certificates to manage the communications between Cloudflare and their origin server (e.g. website), or by utilizing Cloudflare Tunnels to communicate from the origin to Cloudflare.
I think the preceding sentence is the important part, "would have required a customer to disable certain default security configurations on their Cloudflare account and their origin". Which sounds to me like "If you're stupid enough to do this then...". But I'm not one of their customers so what do I know."Even in this instance, any such abuse can be prevented through the use of ..."
I don't know how to take that. It sounds like they are giving an excuse of 'well, you could do this or that, but only if you know about it, and it may cost extra $$ ... we have bugs but there are ways to work around them'.
Thread starter | Title | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
S | Effect of security cameras on LAN | Other LAN and WAN | 11 |
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!