1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
Dismiss Notice

Welcome To SNBForums

SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.

If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!

While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!

Linksys EA9300 Max-Stream AC4000 Tri-Band Wi-Fi Router Reviewed

Discussion in 'Wireless Article Discussions' started by thiggins, Jul 17, 2017.

  1. thiggins

    thiggins Mr. Easy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Messages:
    13,671
    [​IMG]
    Linksys' EA9300 Max-Stream AC4000 Tri-Band Wi-Fi Router tries to spiff up the 3x3 "tri-band" router market with higher link rates, MU-MIMO and a much more powerful CPU.

    Read on SmallNetBuilder
     
    Confused and Jam2 like this.
  2. mokodi

    mokodi Occasional Visitor

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Messages:
    40
    The EA9200 had poor test results for 5ghz. Not sure I’d recommend it.

    Costco has the R7900 with the same processor for $199
     
  3. thiggins

    thiggins Mr. Easy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Messages:
    13,671
    The review does not recommend the EA9200.
     
  4. sfx2000

    sfx2000 Part of the Furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    13,703
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    At first glance...

    That doesn't look like an issues with the PAL cards as clients, that looks like a channel estimation issue - leakage somewhere along the path perhaps, or a bad link estimation threshold on the driver used in the Linksys firmware...
     
  5. thiggins

    thiggins Mr. Easy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Messages:
    13,671
    Linksys is still pursuing the issue.
     
  6. pete y testing

    pete y testing Very Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,909
    Location:
    victoria, australia
    and at the normal mans level , i think linsys may have lost its place in the chewing order and in reality has a quite lower playing field these days , the days of the wrt54gl are gone and if linksys dont do something special imho its all over linksys and im sad about that , there was a day that linksys was the head of the field , these days it just feels they are chasing the pack

    pete
     
  7. Jam2

    Jam2 New Around Here

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2017
    Messages:
    5
    Agreed, Linksys used to be high quality routers with good performance. It appears that for several years now, they have released routers for sale that the end user is the beta tester. Some have had problems with units that are never resolved. They just intro another model of router and hope consumers just move to the new model. This great brand will eventually be damaged by consumers that will move on to another brand. I have been a loyal Linksys supporter and router customer for years. The cost of routers have continually increased to the point that they are not just throw away products in hopes that the next model will be better than your current model. Thanks Tim for your router testing to keep us informed.
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2017
  8. thiggins

    thiggins Mr. Easy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Messages:
    13,671
    Linksys is by no means alone in using its customers as beta testers. The unfortunate state of the consumer Wi-Fi router business is that the industry doesn't wait for specs to be finalized any more. Even when specs are finalized, there are so many opportunities for different spec interpretations and implentations that interoperability problems are almost inevitable.

    The interoperability test matrix is mind-boggling at this point and will continue to get worse with 802.11ax around the corner. Even with the very limited testing I do, I'm finding test time increase to the point where I'm reviewing fewer products. So I feel a tiny bit of the pain Wi-Fi router makers do.

    Chip vendors race to get to market first, then push their customers (the router manufacturers) to get new technology (11ac, MU-MIMO, etc.) into their products ASAP.

    Router makers, in turn, push not-fully-baked products to market, bowing to pressure on one end from the chip makers and retailers (BestBuy, Amazon, etc.) on the other end, to get new stuff on the shelves with higher numbers on the boxes because that's what sells.

    Behavior will not change unless buyers break the cycle and leave stuff on the shelves. Unfortunately, with social media and YouTube "stars" pumping the hype machine, and people still being sucked in by inflated speed numbers, things won't change anytime soon.

    All knowledgeable buyers can do is do their homework, choose carefully, upgrade their devices and don't get fooled by the numbers on product boxes.
     
    TheLostSwede likes this.
  9. ndrp

    ndrp Occasional Visitor

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2014
    Messages:
    46
    What is the idle power comsumption?
     
  10. thiggins

    thiggins Mr. Easy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Messages:
    13,671
    I don't measure power consumption. These things typically draw under 10W.
     
  11. ndrp

    ndrp Occasional Visitor

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2014
    Messages:
    46
    It's easy to measure and is interesting information. Another thing I'm missing is the simultaneus throughput.

    Power comsumption when transfering data varies alot.
    TP-Link Archer C7: 23 W
    Tenda Wireless AC1750: 42 W
    D-Link DIR 868L: 25 W
    Asus RT-AC68U: 46 W
    Linksys EA6900: 34 W
     
  12. thiggins

    thiggins Mr. Easy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Messages:
    13,671
    Simultaneous throughput of what?

    I no longer measure it for wired or wireless because I found the measurements were misleading, especially on wireless. Wi-Fi is half duplex.
     
  13. ndrp

    ndrp Occasional Visitor

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2014
    Messages:
    46
    Routing performance.
     
    Last edited: Jul 19, 2017
  14. psychopomp1

    psychopomp1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    264
    Location:
    UK
    Typo in 6th paragraph?

    I guess that should say it looks like the EA9500?
     
  15. psychopomp1

    psychopomp1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Messages:
    264
    Location:
    UK
    All manufacturers' routers when first released will be in beta as bugs are normal in newly released routers. That is a fact of life and will never change. In my experience, Linksys routers are amongst the least buggy when first released, with Asus being the worst. Have a look at the thread for the Asus GT-AC5300 for confirmation...

    https://www.snbforums.com/threads/rog-rapture-gt-ac5300-owners.38794/
     
  16. thiggins

    thiggins Mr. Easy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Messages:
    13,671
    Thanks for the catch. Fixed.
     
  17. hungarianhc

    hungarianhc Regular Contributor

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2011
    Messages:
    173
    Well said. I was chasing the newest router technology for years... I ended up with the Asus RT-68U w/ Merlin firmware, and it was pretty good... way better than most, but then I went the Ubiquiti route. Setup sucked. It was a pain. Also, it's not as easy for me to go in and make quick changes. The UI just isn't as intuitive. That being said, my wireless performance has never been more rock solid, uptime is expressed in months, and routing performance is amazing as well. Also, it wasn't expensive... Just an edgerouter X + one of their access points.
     
  18. sfx2000

    sfx2000 Part of the Furniture

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    13,703
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Generally WiFi performance has not improved since the release of 802.11ac, and the subsequent WiFi Alliance Wave 1 level devices... which is going now, for what, 5 years?

    Which explains why a 5 year old design still works fairly well...
     
  19. pete y testing

    pete y testing Very Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,909
    Location:
    victoria, australia
    i would say not improved , but more only improved marginally thats mainly due to fine tuning and beamforming as the ( for example ) rt-ac88u does cover a greater area than the rt-ac68u as far as client connectivity goes

    in testing here at 25 meters and through 3 or 4 walls my wemo switch wont connect to the rt-ac68u but will connect to the rt-ac88u and other 2156M wave 2 routers

    i have read testing where the ubiquiti stuff doesnt actually cover as much as normal wireless routers as they are designed to work in multiples and so provide better coverage because of this multiple ap setup
     
  20. TheLostSwede

    TheLostSwede Regular Contributor

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2014
    Messages:
    130
    I wouldn't blame the router makers alone when it comes to buggy solutions, the chip makers rush things to the router makers as well and deliver poor code that's barely fit for purpose in many cases. Features are half baked and with the chip makers not wanting to invest in delivering better software, it's down to the router makers to try and fix things as good as they can on their own. Sometimes there are serious software bugs that prevents the hardware from working as expected and the chipset makers are not even interested in solving the issues, as it's taking up too much of their time and resources. So I would say that until the chipset makers do their job properly, it's not really fair to blame the router makers as the first point for these issues.