Ubuntu server is on my mind right now and I wonder if it was possible to boot linux from an external USB stick, and use software raid for the rest four slots in the box.
The reason why I need to install a linux server is because I wanted RAID support and other features offered by a standard server. The nerfed features on a lot of NAS boxes just don't do the trick.
I'm currently eying on Easystore home server and thecus N4100PRO. Performance isn't really an issue here since it's for home use, some 30-40MB/s read write would be more than enough, even 20MB/s is bearable. In fact, I'm even gonna go for Seagate Low Power drives to cut down heat, power consumption, noise and $$. I also read from your site that seagate drives have better stability in RAID configurations. (thanks!)
Easystore is a much better buy hardware wise, it's got better CPU, RAM and even a 1T HDD. On the other hand, though, not supporting RAID is a big downside.
Some say that Windows Home Server's Drive Expansion feature is better than raid by indicating that the data stored on the drive are safe (even though it's not fail resistant like RAID1 or 5 or 6) without much details. I googled and couldn't find much details on Drive Expansion feature, so how it is better than RAID is beyond me. I hope folks here can enlighten me on the Drive Expansion feature as how this "new" technology helps keeping your data safe without using a RAID-like config, or maybe the linked article is just misleading.
Thecus 4100pro will probably be my safe bet right now because even if I can't install linux on it, it had everything I ask for, but you can't beat the price point of Acer easystore product.
One last question, most of the cheap NAS products on the market now are using software RAID, right?
Sorry for the clustered writing, it is just that after a lot of reading, I have too much in mind right now and not able to think straight. Please help me decide, thanks.
The reason why I need to install a linux server is because I wanted RAID support and other features offered by a standard server. The nerfed features on a lot of NAS boxes just don't do the trick.
I'm currently eying on Easystore home server and thecus N4100PRO. Performance isn't really an issue here since it's for home use, some 30-40MB/s read write would be more than enough, even 20MB/s is bearable. In fact, I'm even gonna go for Seagate Low Power drives to cut down heat, power consumption, noise and $$. I also read from your site that seagate drives have better stability in RAID configurations. (thanks!)
Easystore is a much better buy hardware wise, it's got better CPU, RAM and even a 1T HDD. On the other hand, though, not supporting RAID is a big downside.
Some say that Windows Home Server's Drive Expansion feature is better than raid by indicating that the data stored on the drive are safe (even though it's not fail resistant like RAID1 or 5 or 6) without much details. I googled and couldn't find much details on Drive Expansion feature, so how it is better than RAID is beyond me. I hope folks here can enlighten me on the Drive Expansion feature as how this "new" technology helps keeping your data safe without using a RAID-like config, or maybe the linked article is just misleading.
Thecus 4100pro will probably be my safe bet right now because even if I can't install linux on it, it had everything I ask for, but you can't beat the price point of Acer easystore product.
One last question, most of the cheap NAS products on the market now are using software RAID, right?
Sorry for the clustered writing, it is just that after a lot of reading, I have too much in mind right now and not able to think straight. Please help me decide, thanks.
