carpeperdiem
New Around Here
Greetings to all. Enjoying the read here...
I just upgraded to Time Warner's so-called "wideband" service (50/5) here in NYC. Expensive, but I want the upstream speed and it works. UNFORTUNATELY, the SMC modem provided by TWC has more than a few issues (I will post about this in the appropriate forum), and I must run a router behind it. No worries. I have 2 different 10/100 routers (Linksys BEFS41 and Belkin F5D7230-4). BOTH of these units fail to deliver more than 12-14 Mbps in either direction to/from the WAN. What is that about? Shouldn't a rated 100 Mbs port deliver something *close* to 100? If the 100 port delivered 83, I would chalk it up to overhead. But 13? Geez. Disappointed.
So I started looking for a wired solution -- but it appears that the models represented on the very helpful Router Chart are primarily wireless and focused on the newer N models.
Are there any wired routers in the sub-$100 range that can deliver > 60 Mbps WAN to LAN? Maybe I have to go with a new N wireless to get this kind of throughput?
Thanks for any suggestions.
J
I just upgraded to Time Warner's so-called "wideband" service (50/5) here in NYC. Expensive, but I want the upstream speed and it works. UNFORTUNATELY, the SMC modem provided by TWC has more than a few issues (I will post about this in the appropriate forum), and I must run a router behind it. No worries. I have 2 different 10/100 routers (Linksys BEFS41 and Belkin F5D7230-4). BOTH of these units fail to deliver more than 12-14 Mbps in either direction to/from the WAN. What is that about? Shouldn't a rated 100 Mbs port deliver something *close* to 100? If the 100 port delivered 83, I would chalk it up to overhead. But 13? Geez. Disappointed.
So I started looking for a wired solution -- but it appears that the models represented on the very helpful Router Chart are primarily wireless and focused on the newer N models.
Are there any wired routers in the sub-$100 range that can deliver > 60 Mbps WAN to LAN? Maybe I have to go with a new N wireless to get this kind of throughput?
Thanks for any suggestions.
J