Any 4x4:4 will be better.
RT-AX88U Pro, for example.
Sorry I didn't get you.Probably not. It just has 3x3:3 antennae for the 2.4GHz Band.
RT-AX88U Pro.
www.asus.com
![]()
ASUS Deutschland
Entdecke die Welt von ASUS - Alles rund um die besten Mainboards, Grafikkarten, Monitore, Laptops und vieles mehr erfährst Du auf der offiziellen ASUS Seite.www.asus.com
I guessed wrong.
The AX4200 you have only has 3x3:3 for 5GHz. For 2.4GHz, it is worse: 2x2:2.
The number of antennae is the NxN, and the :N is the number of streams (no, they don't always match). They all matter.
Yes, overall a much better, better balanced, and superior purchase.
As for the absolute range, your environment will still determine that in the end.
Great, thanks!All WiFi routers still being sold today are (almost) backward compatible with the original iteration first released in 1971. That is what WiFi is based on, after all. Compatibility.
That screenshot doesn't show anything relevant to being compatible, btw.
www.asus.com
The TUF series is not a good choice. Particularly when the RT-AX88U Pro is already a proven model.
6 antennae? Is there any wire inside two of them? Or, does the TUF model use two for dedicated 2.4GHz (or 5GHz), while the other four are shared?
If it had 8 (or 12) antennae, it could make real use of them. I don't know what benefits 6 antennae may offer to a 4x4:4 router on each of its bands, if there really are 6 antennae, of course.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.