Ok thanks again. Interesting. Then I find the names of those options very peculiar, unless I’ve misunderstood preamble and modulation scheme.I highly doubt they got mislabeled. It would require an active change for this to happen.
frankly, it would be preferred by me if for no other reason than consolidation. there may have been some talk that the mesh code is "sealed" and as a result safer. i just may take that dive.If I'm not mistaken, the guidance has been that there's no added benefit to running Merlin on your node(s). For me it's a matter of choice. Just pointing out that it works.
While it is not necessary to run Asus or Merlin on an AiMesh node one advantage is that Merlin has SMB2. OK, so I have a 2TB drive on my node to use as a backup for my videos. And yes, I do have Merlin on the node with SMB1 disabled.frankly, it would be preferred by me if for no other reason than consolidation. there may have been some talk that the mesh code is "sealed" and as a result safer. i just may take that dive.
Dec 31 19:00:36 kernel: skb_free_task created successfully with start budget 32, period 10ms
Dec 31 19:00:36 kernel: bcm_tcp_task created successfully with budget 256 ,cpumask:0x6
Dec 31 19:00:36 kernel: enet_kthread_init:L637 ENET system contructed and configured enet-kthrd thread
Dec 31 19:00:36 kernel: enet_kthread_handler:L595 Instantiating ENET thread
Dec 31 19:00:38 kernel: eth1 (Int switch port: 5) (Logical Port: 5) (phyId: 6) Link Up at 10000 mbps full duplex AN: Off
Dec 31 19:00:46 kernel: eth0 (Int switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 0) (phyId: 9) Link Up at 100 mbps full duplex AN: On
Nov 27 16:46:58 crond[4259]: time disparity of 1003545 minutes detected
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: skb_free_task created successfully with start budget 32, period 10ms
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: bcm_tcp_task created successfully with budget 256 ,cpumask:0x6
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: enet_kthread_init:L637 ENET system contructed and configured enet-kthrd thread
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: enet_kthread_handler:L595 Instantiating ENET thread
Dec 31 19:00:39 kernel: eth1 (Int switch port: 5) (Logical Port: 5) (phyId: 6) Link Up at 10000 mbps full duplex AN: Off
Dec 31 19:00:47 kernel: eth0 (Int switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 0) (phyId: 9) Link Up at 100 mbps full duplex AN: On
Nov 27 17:26:29 crond[4257]: time disparity of 1003585 minutes detected
May 3 20:23:22 crond[4257]: time disparity of 15005317 minutes detected
May 3 20:23:22 kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
May 3 20:23:22 kernel: rcu: 1-...!: (213 ticks this GP) idle=95e/0/0x1 softirq=532151/532426 fqs=0
May 3 20:23:22 kernel: rcu: (t=900318639124 jiffies g=140121 q=170)
May 3 20:23:22 kernel: rcu: rcu_sched kthread starved for 900318639128 jiffies! g140121 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=2
May 3 20:23:22 kernel: rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
May 3 21:12:14 kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
May 3 21:12:14 kernel: rcu: 2-...!: (1 GPs behind) idle=132/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=2356225/2356226 fqs=1
May 3 21:12:14 kernel: rcu: (t=974954 jiffies g=4153833 q=61)
Nov 15 12:02:41 kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
Nov 15 12:02:41 kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
Nov 15 12:02:41 kernel: rcu: 1-....: (1 GPs behind) idle=50a/0/0x1 softirq=2171837/2171838 fqs=6
Nov 15 12:02:41 kernel: rcu: 1-...!: (333 ticks this GP) idle=50a/0/0x1 softirq=2171342/2171838 fqs=0
Nov 15 12:02:41 kernel: rcu: (t=900514227672 jiffies g=4153833 q=123857)
Nov 15 12:02:41 kernel: rcu: (detected by 3, t=900513252722 jiffies, g=257969, q=5)
Nov 15 12:02:41 kernel: rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 900513252730 jiffies! g4153833 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=0
Nov 15 12:02:41 kernel: rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
Nov 15 12:02:41 crond[4257]: time disparity of 15008570 minutes detected
May 30 03:58:44 crond[4257]: time disparity of 15008571 minutes detected
May 30 03:58:44 kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
May 30 03:58:44 kernel: rcu: 2-...!: (1 ticks this GP) idle=98e/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=2548583/2548583 fqs=0
May 30 03:58:44 kernel: rcu: (t=974854 jiffies g=4496261 q=165)
May 30 03:58:44 kernel: rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 974854 jiffies! g4496261 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x402 ->cpu=1
May 30 03:58:44 kernel: rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
May 30 03:58:44 kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
May 30 03:58:44 kernel: rcu: 1-...!: (1 ticks this GP) idle=0e6/0/0x1 softirq=2355609/2355609 fqs=0
May 30 03:58:44 kernel: rcu: (t=900514227567 jiffies g=4496261 q=54154)
May 30 03:58:44 kernel: rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 900514227567 jiffies! g4496261 f0x2 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=1
May 30 03:58:44 kernel: rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
May 30 04:59:54 kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
May 30 04:59:54 kernel: rcu: 3-...!: (1 GPs behind) idle=61e/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=4677231/4677232 fqs=0
May 30 04:59:54 kernel: rcu: (t=974956 jiffies g=8212437 q=513)
May 30 04:59:54 kernel: rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 974956 jiffies! g8212437 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x402 ->cpu=1
May 30 04:59:54 kernel: rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
Dec 11 18:50:22 crond[4257]: time disparity of 15008570 minutes detected
Dec 11 18:50:22 kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
Dec 11 18:50:22 kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
Dec 11 18:50:22 kernel: rcu: (detected by 3, t=900514227661 jiffies, g=8212437, q=53942)
Dec 11 18:50:22 kernel: rcu: 1-...!: (5 ticks this GP) idle=7c2/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=3962119/3962119 fqs=0
Dec 11 18:50:22 kernel: rcu: All QSes seen, last rcu_preempt kthread activity 900514227661 (3606166315200-2705652087539), jiffies_till_next_fqs=3, root ->qsmask 0x0
Dec 11 18:50:22 kernel: rcu: (detected by 0, t=900513252705 jiffies, g=422449, q=245)
Dec 11 18:50:22 kernel: rcu: rcu_sched kthread starved for 900513252705 jiffies! g422449 f0x2 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x200 ->cpu=3
Dec 11 18:50:22 kernel: rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
Dec 11 19:01:37 kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
Dec 11 19:01:37 kernel: rcu: (detected by 2, t=974958 jiffies, g=8886189, q=44)
Dec 11 19:01:37 kernel: rcu: All QSes seen, last rcu_preempt kthread activity 974958 (3606167965543-3606166990585), jiffies_till_next_fqs=3, root ->qsmask 0x0
Dec 11 19:01:37 kernel: rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 974958 jiffies! g8886189 f0x2 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x200 ->cpu=1
Dec 11 19:01:37 kernel: rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
Jun 24 10:52:05 crond[4257]: time disparity of 15008570 minutes detected
Jun 24 10:52:05 kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
Jun 24 10:52:05 kernel: rcu: (detected by 1, t=900514227665 jiffies, g=8886189, q=49557)
Jun 24 10:52:05 kernel: rcu: All QSes seen, last rcu_preempt kthread activity 900514227671 (4506681218256-3606166990585), jiffies_till_next_fqs=3, root ->qsmask 0x0
Jun 24 10:52:05 kernel: rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 900514227741 jiffies! g8886189 f0x2 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=1
Jun 24 10:52:05 kernel: rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: skb_free_task created successfully with start budget 32, period 10ms
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: bcm_tcp_task created successfully with budget 256 ,cpumask:0x6
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: enet_kthread_init:L637 ENET system contructed and configured enet-kthrd thread
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: enet_kthread_handler:L595 Instantiating ENET thread
Dec 31 19:00:39 kernel: eth1 (Int switch port: 5) (Logical Port: 5) (phyId: 6) Link Up at 10000 mbps full duplex AN: Off
Dec 31 19:00:47 kernel: eth0 (Int switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 0) (phyId: 9) Link Up at 100 mbps full duplex AN: On
Nov 27 20:51:57 crond[4256]: time disparity of 1003790 minutes detected
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: skb_free_task created successfully with start budget 32, period 10ms
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: bcm_tcp_task created successfully with budget 256 ,cpumask:0x6
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: enet_kthread_init:L637 ENET system contructed and configured enet-kthrd thread
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: enet_kthread_handler:L595 Instantiating ENET thread
Dec 31 19:00:39 kernel: eth1 (Int switch port: 5) (Logical Port: 5) (phyId: 6) Link Up at 10000 mbps full duplex AN: Off
Dec 31 19:00:47 kernel: eth0 (Int switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 0) (phyId: 9) Link Up at 100 mbps full duplex AN: On
That's probably for the best anyway with the broadcom drivers being involved.I'll probably do a full reset/reinstall this afternoon
nothing like beating a dead horse.hoping not to diverge too much from the topic, but with 3006, is there any new guidance re the use of merlinware on mesh nodes? for those who may not be aware, consensus has been to load stock fw on the nodes. i'm just wondering if we've reached that point, where it may be ok.
regards
usually a good idea to clear browser cache every so often...Having issues with my AX86U Pro.
After updating from 3006.102.6, the routers web interface is slow, laggy and will sometimes crash and reload.
I've restarted the router, but it's still doing this.
**edit** oddly, rebooting the pc that I was using to view the interface seems to have resolved the issue.
It is indeed the BE92U. And I did a complete factory reset, staying at 102.6, and it's still rebooting randomly.@bpsmicro - I'm assuming this is happening on the RT-BE92U as I've seen the same thing ever since buying the router. I ended up having to write a script to check that the year reported by the clock was not less than 1969 and if it was, force a restart of the router as the ntpd isn't able to update the clock when it ends up back in the 1918s. My best guess is that something in the broadcom driver ends up overwriting memory where it shouldn't and clobbers the system time.
Downgraded to 102.4, factory reset and painstaking reapplication of my basic settings. Still reboots and the syslog still shows bogus timestamps. Unfortunately, since syslog doesn't include the year, I can't tell if your theory about that is correct. But I surmise it's not the broadcom driver unless this has been around since 102.4. But then I'd expect to see more complaints.@bpsmicro - I'm assuming this is happening on the RT-BE92U as I've seen the same thing ever since buying the router. I ended up having to write a script to check that the year reported by the clock was not less than 1969 and if it was, force a restart of the router as the ntpd isn't able to update the clock when it ends up back in the 1918s. My best guess is that something in the broadcom driver ends up overwriting memory where it shouldn't and clobbers the system time.
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu: 0-...!: (1 GPs behind) idle=372/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=743644/743645 fqs=0
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu: (t=979249 jiffies g=916005 q=32)
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 979249 jiffies! g916005 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x402 ->cpu=1
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: Call trace:
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: __switch_to+0xe8/0x170
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: __schedule+0x214/0x5a0
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: schedule+0x38/0xa0
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: schedule_timeout+0x15c/0x2a0
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu_gp_kthread+0x488/0x900
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: kthread+0x118/0x150
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: ret_from_fork+0x10/0x24
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: Call trace:
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x150
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: show_stack+0x14/0x20
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: sched_show_task+0x100/0x120
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: dump_cpu_task+0x40/0x4c
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0x90/0xcc
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu_check_callbacks+0x67c/0x810
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: update_process_times+0x2c/0x70
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: tick_sched_timer+0x54/0xd0
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: __hrtimer_run_queues+0x13c/0x1d0
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: hrtimer_interrupt+0xe4/0x2b0
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: arch_timer_handler_phys+0x30/0x40
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x80/0x140
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: __handle_domain_irq+0x70/0xd0
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: gic_handle_irq+0x5c/0xc0
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: el0_irq_naked+0x4c/0x54
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: Call trace:
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: __switch_to+0xe8/0x170
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick+0x3c/0xd0
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: tick_nohz_idle_exit+0x90/0xe0
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: do_idle+0x14c/0x260
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: cpu_startup_entry+0x24/0x40
May 6 22:01:54 kernel: secondary_start_kernel+0x13c/0x170
Yeah, I've seen it on mine from the very first release. Near as I can tell it is somehow related to some network setting that messes things up. I was able to eventually get things more or less stable by setting the main network to just the 5 & 6 GHz radios and only one Guest Network on the 2.4 GHz radio.Downgraded to 102.4, factory reset and painstaking reapplication of my basic settings. Still reboots and the syslog still shows bogus timestamps. Unfortunately, since syslog doesn't include the year, I can't tell if your theory about that is correct. But I surmise it's not the broadcom driver unless this has been around since 102.4. But then I'd expect to see more complaints.
The only block that seems to indicate trouble brewing is this:
Code:May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu: 0-...!: (1 GPs behind) idle=372/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=743644/743645 fqs=0 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu: (t=979249 jiffies g=916005 q=32) May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 979249 jiffies! g916005 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x402 ->cpu=1 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump: May 6 22:01:54 kernel: Call trace: May 6 22:01:54 kernel: __switch_to+0xe8/0x170 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: __schedule+0x214/0x5a0 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: schedule+0x38/0xa0 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: schedule_timeout+0x15c/0x2a0 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu_gp_kthread+0x488/0x900 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: kthread+0x118/0x150 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: ret_from_fork+0x10/0x24 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: Call trace: May 6 22:01:54 kernel: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x150 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: show_stack+0x14/0x20 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: sched_show_task+0x100/0x120 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: dump_cpu_task+0x40/0x4c May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0x90/0xcc May 6 22:01:54 kernel: rcu_check_callbacks+0x67c/0x810 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: update_process_times+0x2c/0x70 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: tick_sched_timer+0x54/0xd0 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: __hrtimer_run_queues+0x13c/0x1d0 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: hrtimer_interrupt+0xe4/0x2b0 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: arch_timer_handler_phys+0x30/0x40 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x80/0x140 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: __handle_domain_irq+0x70/0xd0 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: gic_handle_irq+0x5c/0xc0 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: el0_irq_naked+0x4c/0x54 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: Call trace: May 6 22:01:54 kernel: __switch_to+0xe8/0x170 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick+0x3c/0xd0 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: tick_nohz_idle_exit+0x90/0xe0 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: do_idle+0x14c/0x260 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: cpu_startup_entry+0x24/0x40 May 6 22:01:54 kernel: secondary_start_kernel+0x13c/0x170
Not sure what "rcu" is.
Okay, yeah, I can see that now. I SSH'ed in and just checked date every now and then, and it changed from correct to Wed May 8 04:54:27 EDT 1918.Yeah, I've seen it on mine from the very first release. Near as I can tell it is somehow related to some network setting that messes things up. I was able to eventually get things more or less stable by setting the main network to just the 5 & 6 GHz radios and only one Guest Network on the 2.4 GHz radio.
If you SSH to the router when it's in the bad state, you can run `date` on the command line to get it to report the time.

Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!