Also I want to add my experience of Stubby on R7800 (sorry if I'm off topic):
I enabled all the default servers in the config, both ip4 and ip6, and I got enormous delays/timeouts.
So I decide to stay with DNSCrypt. Both v1 and v2 are running very much better than Stubby - for me.
Just my opinon. I'm trying all three by the moment to implement in my kamoj add-on.
Kamoj, I do not see any off topic.
Well, I can compare three ISP. For first (R9000) stubby is working well (Cloudflare).
Second is R7800 (other ISP). And BTW stubby chooses another Cloudflare server. Not so good, but acceptable speed of resolving. It produces many records in the log file such as:
Code:
. . .
[12:30:36.107735] STUBBY: 2606:4700:4700::1111 : Upstream : No valid upstreams for TLS... promoting this backed-off upstream for re-try...
[12:30:36.108047] STUBBY: 2606:4700:4700::1111 : Upstream : !Backing off TLS on this upstream - Will retry again in 2s at Sun Oct 28 12:30:38 2018
. . .
Third is ASUS router, tried it with stubby from Entware (third ISP). I just cannot use stubby there. Too long response or no response at all. But dnscrypt v1 is working w/o problems.
So. Let's leave while dnscrypt in the next release. People can make their choice.
P.S.
It is better to use
dig from Entware to check the speed of stubby or dnscrypt. E,g, (stubby)
Code:
dig -p 64153 @127.0.0.1 www.snbforums.com
(avoiding cached requests of course).
Voxel.