Does anyone have the 160Mhz working on netgear x10 r9000 router?

[tech960]

If it’s MB/s then it’s nearly impossible. I assume its a reporting issue of your program or OS file manager.

Keep playing with your config, maybe you'll see some real speed.

Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

 

[avtella]

Unless you are using HT160 and Windows is misreporting the link rate (Theoretical Max) that’s the only way. Near 100% efficiency on WiFi let alone Ethernet is impossible due to overhead alone, putting aside other causes.

 

[ulaganath]

Yes, there is a real world use for 160Hmz. As stated, I transfer multi-gig video files to and from the NAS. At 160Mhz my laptop connects to the R7800 @1.73Gbps and I can transfer 2GB files @105 to 110 MBps as opposed to 50 to 60MBps. To answer your second question, yes there are 2 adapters from Intel, 1 from Killer (1550), 1 from dell and a few other but can think of their names. 30 MBps difference may not seem like much unless your are transferring files all day.

Was is 100MB/s copy speed

As I am using a7000 connected At 1300Mbps strong

Waver around 100MB/s avg 88MB/s




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[tech960]

Unless you are using HT160 and Windows is misreporting the link rate (Theoretical Max) that’s the only way. Near 100% efficiency on WiFi let alone Ethernet is impossible due to overhead alone, putting aside other causes.

I wish I cared enough to screen shot it for ya.. But I don't, sorry.

 

[Internet Man]

My guess as to why its not sanctioned is that it probably doesnt leave DFS channels upon radar detection making it non conformal to regulations.

The FCC entry includes a DFS test report conducted using Firmware version V1.0.1.6_DFS_cus4_1027. I assume that the tests passed which would suggest that the R9000 is capable of conforming with the requirements when using the right firmware.

 

[avtella]

You are right I remember seeing that, it's definitely an odd situation.