Error in BE98-Pro User Manual?

[onesus]

The GT-BE98 Pro User Manual, in the DHCP Server setup section, p. 61, "We recommend that you use an IP address format of 192.168.1.xxx (where xxx can be any number between 2 and 254) when specifying an IP address range." But the default router IP address is 192.168.50.1 and I don't see any advice to change it; wouldn't the recommendation put DHCP assignments on a subnet different from the router? Am I missing something?

 

[Tech9]

The GT-BD98 Pro User Manual

What is GT-BD98 Pro?

Use 192.168.50.xxx if you like. No need to change it.

 

[Justinh]

Probably just out-dated info (typo), because at one time 192.168.1.x was the default

 

[onesus]

What is GT-BD98 Pro?

The Quick Start Guide:
"ROG Rapture GT-BE98 Pro
"BE30000 Quad-band Gaming Router"

 

[onesus]

The Quick Start Guide:
"ROG Rapture GT-BE98 Pro
"BE30000 Quad-band Gaming Router"

So "BD" was my typo.
(Now corrected above)

 

[bbunge]

The GT-BE98 Pro User Manual, in the DHCP Server setup section, p. 61, "We recommend that you use an IP address format of 192.168.1.xxx (where xxx can be any number between 2 and 254) when specifying an IP address range." But the default router IP address is 192.168.50.1 and I don't see any advice to change it; wouldn't the recommendation put DHCP assignments on a subnet different from the router? Am I missing something?

It is not a mistake. Rather another case where the author(s) of the manual think like a technician rather than a consumer. And, they do not have the resources or time to test their writing. I wrote software documentation in another life and it is not easy. I still do some instructions/documentation on a WIKI.

 

[Tech9]

This is a Copy/Paste error. Result of rushing and low QC. There were many such errors in firmware help tips on AX-class routers.

 

[Untried3868]

Probably just out-dated info (typo), because at one time 192.168.1.x was the default

Curious. I've always wondered, why the change? is using 192.168.50.xxx any better/safer than 192.1681.xxx, or is it a flip of the coin?

 

[aaronwt]

Or use 10.x.x.x. I never use an octet beginning with 192 for my LAN IP addresses.

 

[Tech9]

Or use 10.x.x.x. I never use an octet beginning with 192 for my LAN IP addresses.

Don't complain when your Client List gets messed up completely.

 

[Justinh]

Curious. I've always wondered, why the change? is using 192.168.50.xxx any better/safer than 192.1681.xxx, or is it a flip of the coin?

My guess would be that it can clash with ISP equipment that also commonly defaults with 192.168.1.x.

 

[Justinh]

Don't complain when your Client List gets messed up completely.

What are you talking about, Tech9? I haven't had a problem with my client list using 10.x.x.x.

 

[Ripshod]

What are you talking about, Tech9? I haven't had a problem with my client list using 10.x.x.x.

Ditto

 

[aaronwt]

Don't complain when your Client List gets messed up completely.

Why would it get messed up? In the late 90's I started using 221 as the first number in the Octet for my LAN, when I was using a PC for a DHCP server. Which was a Chinese IP address, so I figured it wouldn't cause any issues for me in the US. And it didn't. I used that Octet beginning with 221 on my LAN until 2022, when I got an AX89X router. And then I used the opportunity to switch to an Octet starting with 10. Since I had to input everything from scratch and couldn't upload the settings file from my old Asus router to the AX89X. In those 26+ years I've never had a client list get messed up.

I prefer not to use an Octet starting with 192, because many devices use that as the default IP address. Which has confused me in the past. Of course this is a personal preference. And whether using 192 or 10 it will work just the same.