AlphaGator1
Occasional Visitor
I switched back to ISP DNS...will test tonightDon't be surprised, ISP DNS is the fastest. It's one hop away and sends your request to local resources.
I switched back to ISP DNS...will test tonightDon't be surprised, ISP DNS is the fastest. It's one hop away and sends your request to local resources.
I know the router won't be intercepting it
I mean disabling "Advertise router's IP in addition to user-specified DNS"...my understanding is that setting add's the router as a middleman for DNS and disabling allows everything to go directly to the ISP's DNS. I don't fully understand this setting, but disabling it fixed my lag without any adverse effects.Not sure what do you mean by "intercepting it". ISP DNS is like any other upstream DNS service.
There's a customizable DNS comparator on the Dashboard page. You can add your ISP DNSes to the list. It will compare all of them with the fastest at the top. For the longest time Google was quickest for me here in Southern California, but lately the primary AT&T DNS has topped the list as fastest.I switched back to ISP DNS...will test tonight
OK, thanks for that!There's a customizable DNS comparator on the Dashboard page. You can add your ISP DNSes to the list. It will compare all of them with the fastest at the top. For the longest time Google was quickest for me here in Southern California, but lately the primary AT&T DNS has topped the list as fastest.
For whatever reason setting the primary and secondary WAN DNS tends to make the comparator test them as "artificially" slower, so sometimes I will change both to other DNS servers completely, check the results, then switch back to my preference.
Be very careful if you are enabling IPv6. I haven't touched anything on the LAN DNS settings as it seems very sensitive, even crashing the Ai router...
Should I enable MLO maybe?
I had just restarted everything when I took that screenshot. I have over 40 clients throughout a very large house (5,200 sqft). The nodes are not about the number of clients though, it's about providing coverage in every room.You may want to enable some reading before purchasing random hardware. You have under 30 clients on 6 (!) routers with mixed limited AiMesh compatibility and radio configurations mismatch. If this system is wired - tri-band models are pointless, if it's wireless - can't have dedicated radios for backhaul. It also exceeds recommended 5 nodes including the main router. Not very clear what value adds $900 router with single limited range 6GHz radio to this picture. It just messes up more the 4x GT6 setup with it's single 5GHz radio. The old RT-AC5300 - this one has to be recycled. When used it potentially slows down the entire network.
no, but I will give it a try. that's for a part of the house for guests, and we have none, so I can turn it off.Have you tried removing the RT-AC5300 as a node and leave it powered off for a day or two and see if the network settles down ?
The nodes are not about the number of clients though, it's about providing coverage in every room.
Unfortunately, no CAT wiring. I do have RG6 and am using that to do wired backhaul down to the basement from the 2nd floor using a MoCA device (which works perfectly fine).Does the house have CAT5e or CAT6 wiring to the locations ( or even RG6 for that matter) or is it only possible to use wireless backhaul ?
This certainly appears to be an example of spending too much money. A neighbor was in a similar situation (multi-level home 5000sqft with 4-car detached garage on 3/4 acre lot) with over purchasing to "fix" his network. He hired a local IT firm that specialized in office and residential networks. He went from a situation like yours to a significantly simpler network, plus an outdoor AP for his backyard wifi.Should I enable MLO maybe? I have the GT6 as my main AI Mesh nodes, with an AC5300 in one of the more remote bedrooms.
View attachment 70300
i have my entire house on MOCA in a physical star layout ( pair of moca modems to each destination) providing LAN connection for 4 SMB APs as well as LAN switches. Running 5Ghz band only. The SMB APs have their RF TX power lowered to provide good roaming and coverage. 3,000 sq ft , two story, coverage including outdoor leakage. Never regretted the trade off of less troubleshooting and reliable system versus extra initial cost. Haven't touched it in about a decade.Unfortunately, no CAT wiring. I do have RG6 and am using that to do wired backhaul down to the basement from the 2nd floor using a MoCA device (which works perfectly fine).
coolThis certainly appears to be an example of spending too much money. A neighbor was in a similar situation (multi-level home 5000sqft with 4-car detached garage on 3/4 acre lot) with over purchasing to "fix" his network. He hired a local IT firm that specialized in office and residential networks. He went from a situation like yours to a significantly simpler network, plus an outdoor AP for his backyard wifi.
OK, thanks for that!
Welp, I lied. It's back to lagging again (haven't tried in several days). I give up. I don't really care about this specific website...I am just annoyed that this is happening, and this just happens to be the one place I notice it. It's not difficult to switch to the AT&T router, but it bothers me that this very expensive ASUS is somehow not faster than my cheap butt AT&T modem/router.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.