What would be the difference and best approach compared setting it to "Mixed"? Its not the same thing? I personally have a WRT1900AC V1. But, I have it set to N only and 20mhz.
It's complicated...
First - N-Only Mode (Greenfield) is pretty awesome, unless... there are legacy AP's and Clients within range, then an N-Only configuration goes into Protection Mode - which means every frame transmitted needs to do a CTS-to-Self, and this adds a lot of overhead to the channel... so to beat that, putting the WiFi chip into B/G/N mode invokes another form of protection called, appropriately enough, Mixed Mode which basically is legacy for management/control frames, and N for data frames...
so all good there...
20MHz vs. 40Mhz - some more overhead as the chipset needs to do a clear channel assessment for every frame on the secondary channel - this takes time which adds overhead and latency... so the cool kids just don't do 40Mhz channels...
FWIW - 40MHz channels - one loses 3dB on the Tx side due to the wider channels with most PA's, and this impacts both the AP and client side - so another reason to not to wide in 2.4, it cuts down the overall range, and impacts the link budget relative to narrow channels at any given range...
With TurboQAM (QAM256, e.g. up to 600MBit mode, whatever), this, on the Marvell (and other chipsets) invokes VHT mode - and this is non-standard for 2.4GHz - so we run into a lot of problems with legacy chipsets that run off the end of the pier with things they don't know, and with 11ac clients, they can get into a problem where they get a bit confused - they know they're in 11n mode, but the AP is sending control messages that they understand but should not do...
So that's the reason why folks that know the WRT1900ac family strongly suggest B/G/N-only mode for this device - it's the one that works best.