What's new
  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

TAILMON TAILMON v1.1.1 -Jul 26, 2025- WireGuard-based Tailscale Installer, Configurator and Monitor (Now available in AMTM!) TAILMON v1.2.02 Beta!

No issues with the beta. Script automatically downgraded overnight to stable but I updated back to beta again. Suspect the same will happen again tonight but that's okay. AOK either way!
Well, if automatically downgrading to stable it would be a bug. Switching should be a manual step.
@rung Yeah, if you're going to upgrade to the beta, I'd probably advise keeping the autoupdate feature off. Definitely higher risk of something going wrong, so you probably want to manually upgrade that along the way. ;)

The script is unidirectional... if it sees a version in the repository that's different than the one that's currently running, it's going to assume it's newer.
 
Yeah, if you're going to upgrade to the beta, I'd probably advise keeping the autoupdate feature off.
Got bitten by this as well overnight @Viktor Jaep ;)
Something to consider may be separating out the binary and script auto-updates, or just ditching the script auto-updates and letting AMTM update checking system handle the notification?
 
@rung Yeah, if you're going to upgrade to the beta, I'd probably advise keeping the autoupdate feature off. Definitely higher risk of something going wrong, so you probably want to manually upgrade that along the way. ;)

The script is unidirectional... if it sees a version in the repository that's different than the one that's currently running, it's going to assume it's newer.
It goes by build date rather than the number? Trying it out at the moment.

"U(P)date Tailscale Binary to latest version" sees the beta as the newest, right? Without ever suggesting stable build? But auto update, don't?
I don't mind to manually do the updates, as long as I get informed about updates I can go and fetch.
 
It goes by build date rather than the number? Trying it out at the moment.
Do you mean the TAILMON script, or the Tailscale binaries?

"U(P)date Tailscale Binary to latest version" sees the beta as the newest, right? Without ever suggesting stable build? But auto update, don't?
I don't mind to manually do the updates, as long as I get informed about updates I can go and fetch.
U(P)date Tailscale Binary to latest version essentially runs "tailscale update" -- it's only going to fetch the most stable version, and may overwrite a Tailscale binary beta that you have installed. That would require a test to see what actually happens.

Update Tailscale to the latest (B)ETA essentially runs "tailscale update --track unstable", so that would update whatever beta you're on to the next newest beta of the Tailscale binaries.
 
Got bitten by this as well overnight @Viktor Jaep ;)
Something to consider may be separating out the binary and script auto-updates, or just ditching the script auto-updates and letting AMTM update checking system handle the notification?
I like the idea of splitting these out. Man, you're always full of great ideas, @Stephen Harrington! :)
 
I like the idea of splitting these out. Man, you're always full of great ideas
Got to keep thinking up things to keep you busy and use up all that spare time you have.
:p
 
I don't mind to manually do the updates, as long as I get informed about updates I can go and fetch.
But yeah, it does look like I can figure out if a new beta comes out, and could fire off an email that a new version can be downloaded.
 
Do you mean the TAILMON script, or the Tailscale binaries?


U(P)date Tailscale Binary to latest version essentially runs "tailscale update" -- it's only going to fetch the most stable version, and may overwrite a Tailscale binary beta that you have installed. That would require a test to see what actually happens.

Update Tailscale to the latest (B)ETA essentially runs "tailscale update --track unstable", so that would update whatever beta you're on to the next newest beta of the Tailscale binaries.
Typing P get me this.

Messages:
Executing: tailscale update
already running unstable version 1.87.12; no update needed
Restart Tailscale?
[y/n]:

It seems to not think that it needs to install the last stable. But if new stable comes with a different date it might?

That makes me wonder why auto update thinks it needs to update Tailscale, every night (?), with that response with the manual check.

As for the update notice, for the script itself, AMTM can do that. But tailmon need to inform about Tail scale. Best of both worlds. Then I got all I need 🙂
 

Similar threads

Latest threads

Support SNBForums w/ Amazon

If you'd like to support SNBForums, just use this link and buy anything on Amazon. Thanks!

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!
Back
Top