Have roaming assistant also disabled on 2.4 & 5.0 ghz?Edit : After disabling the “Protected Management Frames” option on the 2.4 GHz band, the HP printer's Wi-Fi connection seems stable.
It's strange, because with the old version 3004.388.9_2, the “Protected Management Frames” option was always enabled on the 2.4 GHz band and the HP printer's Wi-Fi connection worked perfectly well.
There must have been a small change in the latest Merlin firmware.
Ultimately, the printer connection remains stable when this option is disabled.
Olá a todos,
Estou com problemas com o firmware mais recente 3004.388.10 no meu Asus AX88U.
No início, o flash sujo funcionou corretamente, mas depois as coisas deram errado desde que reiniciei meu roteador; Embora meus dois Wi-Fis de 2,4 e 5 GHz tenham sido ativados separadamente, o ícone do Wi-Fi no MerlinWRT ficou meio verde, meio cinza, e os dispositivos de rede não têm Wi-Fi.
Tente reiniciar, ativar/desativar a WLAN e, por fim, redefinir as configurações de fábrica e configurar tudo novamente, sem sucesso; A rede Wi-Fi é indisponível/invisível em meus dispositivos, não pode ser bloqueada.
Alguém mais passou por isso?
Obrigado pela ajuda.
Editar: Ah, a propósito, observei um detalhe adicional: meu Wi-Fi 5 GHz só oferece o Canal 0...
English only please.
Did you have AiCloud enabled?Hey friend, I'm having the exact same problem as you. My RT-AX88U suddenly lost 5GHz, and both USB ports stopped working. Initially, I thought it might be a hardware issue, as I've tried everything imaginable and the 5GHz won't come back, and neither do the USB ports. They even have some power, as they power the connected hard drive, but they can't recognize the device.
I'll demonstrate this with photos in the link below.
< https://limewire.com/d/sbYdg#EWtvViIoSW >
Did you manage to get yours working on 5GHz again?
Did you have AiCloud enabled?
Go to System Log - General Log and Save the log file. Upload it to limewire.com or www.file.io
Looks like a hardware failure to me. But maybe someone else can spot something I'm not seeing.
Looks like a hardware failure to me. But maybe someone else can spot something I'm not seeing.
I wouldn't jump the gun on hardware failure so quickly
That log looks eerily similar to my logs at the when my AX88 router went sideways after a few days on the release before I dropped back to BETA1 to get back to stability. After running that version, about a week. During which I had but one hiccup (30 secs of "<unknown>: hw csum failure" at the router) but it recovered, and life remained stable the rest of the time. The scripts weren't complaning, https and http wasn't restarting, channels weren't constantly changing either, services were no longer failing and restarting and logging stated.
I reapplied to release onto the AX86 nodes, with BETA1 on the AX88 router. After a few days of stability, I applied the release to the AX88 router again (earlier today) and so far so goodlet's see if it stays stable or goes bonkers again after a few days as it has for others.
For now avoiding even launching the app on the iPhone, even though it was just for visibility. Just logging into the router would trigger services (http/httpd/acs amongst others) to continously restart...
If even a multi-million dollars space shuttle can have hardware failures, then so does a premium router. Technology isn't immune to failures no matter how expensive it is.I'm inclined to accept that I lost a router that was still quite new and for which I paid a high price for the type of product, which angers me, as I paid extra precisely because I believed it was a premium product.
If even a multi-million dollars space shuttle can have hardware failures, then so does a premium router. Technology isn't immune to failures no matter how expensive it is.
Have you tried an electrical reset? Unplug the power (while keeping the router switch turned on. Wait about 5-10 secs, turn it off, plug it back in, then turn it on and try again.
Therefore, it's not a natural electronic equipment defect, as suggested. On the contrary, it's revealing a hidden flaw resulting from a design error, as it's not natural for multiple users to experience the same issue.
Note that in this same thread, just above, a user reports the exact same issue as me. Is this a coincidence?
Thank you for your review.
I think there's a hidden flaw in the RT-AX88U's design, considering this same issue has been reported by some users.
Looks like a hardware failure to me. But maybe someone else can spot something I'm not seeing.
They are not errors. They're normal boot messages.Seems there are some bad sectors in the internal storage:
Bad block table found at page 131008, version 0x01
Bad block table found at page 130944, version 0x01
Just because you noticed a pattern doesn’t mean there’s a design flaw, it’s not automatically true just because multiple failures exist.
You’re mistaking correlation (multiple failures observed) for causation (a proven design flaw). In reality, with mass-produced electronics, some overlap in manufacturing defects is statistically expected, even among high-end products.
Hundreds of identical failures out of millions shipped can occur without implying a design flaw. So, to your question about coincidence. Yes, it’s normal for mass-produced equipment to suffer failures, even for multiple users.
That doesn’t prove a fundamental design flaw; it just shows correlation, not causation. The actual cause could be many things outside of design, such as environmental factors (e.g., a power surge or voltage instability, etc).
What it tells you is the location of the tables that contains the list of bad sectors, not that a bad sector was detected. Bad sectors are very common in NAND, that's why they have tables where these blocks are noted, and any bad sector is remapped to a spare sector.Seems there are some bad sectors in the internal storage:
Bad block table found at page 131008, version 0x01
Bad block table found at page 130944, version 0x01
Oct 15 16:43:49 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(722): eth6: Assoc FC:XX:XX:XX:XX:22, status: Successful (0), rssi:-43
Oct 15 16:43:49 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(685): eth6: Auth 66:XX:XX:XX:XX:5E, status: Successful (0), rssi:0
Oct 15 16:43:49 kernel: br0: received packet on eth6 with own address as source address
Oct 15 16:43:49 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(695): eth6: ReAssoc 66:XX:XX:XX:XX:5E, status: Successful (0), rssi:-64
Oct 15 16:44:03 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(662): eth6: Disassoc 66:XX:XX:XX:XX:5E, status: 0, reason: Disassociated because sending station is leaving (or has left) BSS (8), rssi:0
Oct 15 16:44:03 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(662): eth6: Disassoc 66:XX:XX:XX:XX:5E, status: 0, reason: Disassociated because sending station is leaving (or has left) BSS (8), rssi:0
Oct 15 16:44:22 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(662): eth6: Disassoc FC:XX:XX:XX:XX:22, status: 0, reason: Disassociated because sending station is leaving (or has left) BSS (8), rssi:0
Oct 15 16:44:22 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(662): eth6: Disassoc FC:XX:XX:XX:XX:22, status: 0, reason: Disassociated because sending station is leaving (or has left) BSS (8), rssi:0
Oct 15 16:44:24 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(685): eth6: Auth FC:XX:XX:XX:XX:22, status: Successful (0), rssi:0
Oct 15 16:44:24 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(722): eth6: Assoc FC:XX:XX:XX:XX:22, status: Successful (0), rssi:-43
Oct 15 16:44:28 wlceventd: wlceventd_proc_event(685): eth6: Auth 66:XX:XX:XX:XX:5E, status: Successful (0), rssi:0
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!