What's new
  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

Is Unifi worth the upgrade?

The only comparable UniFi line device to ASUS home routers is UDR7
While I generally agree with your points regarding firmware, this is simply not true - otherwise, this thread wouldn't exist. Both the UDR7 and UX7 are directly comparable. The new compact consoles (not the old rack-mount ones) plus any single AP are comparable as well, even though it's a bulkier setup than a single home router.

The problem is that their Wi-Fi specs for the Wi-Fi 7 devices (except for the really bulky Enterprise-series APs, probably) generally have worse signal strength, lower speeds, and fewer spatial streams. Asus simply wins in terms of raw performance and coverage. I think a UniFi console paired with a non-UniFi AP would work fine, though - delivering both powerful Wi-Fi and a nice set of router features.

Don't get me wrong - my point isn't that UniFi is bad. It's about acknowledging that it's still not ideal, and that more powerful compact home APs / AIO routers would be a great addition to the current Wi-Fi lineup to match Asus' top-of-the-line hardware. And IPv6 support needs improvement - come on, Ubiquiti, it's not 2012. I can't really blame home router brands for this, but SMB-grade hardware should have top-notch networking features, including first-class IPv6 support - it is the future of the web.

this Honda Civic Type R networking (my term, Tech9®) has one advantage only - it's cheap
The UDR7 is a bit cheaper than the RT-BE88U (both have non-ideal Wi-Fi 7 specs - the former is a mediocre tri-band, the latter is a top-spec dual-band). The UCG Fiber + E7 combo is more expensive than the GT-BE98 Pro, but cheaper than the GT-BE19000AI. Comparable configs aren't that different. UniFi just doesn't have budget devices in their lineup, unlike Asus.
 
While I generally agree with your points regarding firmware, this is simply not true - otherwise, this thread wouldn't exist. Both the UDR7 and UX7 are directly comparable. The new compact consoles (not the old rack-mount ones) plus any single AP are comparable as well, even though it's a bulkier setup than a single home router.

The problem is that their Wi-Fi specs for the Wi-Fi 7 devices (except for the really bulky Enterprise-series APs, probably) generally have worse signal strength, lower speeds, and fewer spatial streams. I think a UniFi console paired with a non-UniFi AP would work fine, though - delivering both powerful Wi-Fi and a nice set of router features.

Don't get me wrong - my point isn't that UniFi is bad. It's about acknowledging that it's still not ideal, and that more powerful compact home APs / AIO routers would be a great addition to the current Wi-Fi lineup to match Asus' top-of-the-line hardware. And IPv6 support needs improvement - come on, Ubiquiti, it's not 2012. I can't really blame home router brands for this, but SMB-grade hardware should have top-notch networking features, including first-class IPv6 support - it is the future of the web.


The UDR7 is a bit cheaper than the RT-BE88U (both have non-ideal Wi-Fi 7 specs - the former is a mediocre tri-band, the latter is a top-spec dual-band). The UCG Fiber + E7 combo is more expensive than the GT-BE98 Pro, but cheaper than the GT-BE19000AI. Comparable configs aren't that different. UniFi just doesn't have budget devices in their lineup, unlike Asus.
I have to disagree with you on that. On paper, ASUS routers might look faster when you compare their specs, but that doesn’t reflect real-world performance. I directly compared the ASUS GS‑BE18000 with the UniFi U7 Pro XG. Technically, the ASUS has better specifications—like 4x4 spatial streams on both 5 GHz and 6 GHz compared to the UniFi’s 2x2—but that advantage doesn’t translate to actual use.
In real-world tests, the speeds across my devices were mostly identical, except on the PS5 Pro, where transfer rates nearly doubled when connected to the UniFi. Where the UniFi clearly wins is in stability and reliability. I returned the ASUS after months of frustration: random 5 GHz dropouts, connection drops, AirPlay issues—you name it. Switching to UniFi solved all of that. And as a bonus, the UniFi dashboard feels modern and intuitive, unlike ASUS’s interface, which looks straight out of 2010.
 
I have a direct comparison between ASUS GS-BE18000 and Unify U7 Pro XG. FIRST device technically have better specs like for example 4x4 spatial streams on 5ghz and 6ghz vs 2x2 on Unify.
Well, maybe UniFi devices perform differently even if they have the same Wi-Fi specs on paper. The UX7 is definitely worse than the Asus. I suspect the UDR7 is too. Maybe the U7 Pro XG is better.

I returned the ASUS after months of frustration: random 5 GHz dropouts, connection drops, AirPlay issues
It probably depends on the model. I've never had issues with the RT-**88U or RT-**86U lineup - both the Wi-Fi 6 and 7 models. I have around 20 devices connected, including plenty of IoT ones.

ASUS’s interface, which looks straight out of 2010
It looks dated, but that doesn't say anything about the quality of the software. For example, Xiaomi's dashboard looks fancier, but their routers are complete crap - even worse than the rest of the Chinese junk.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Support SNBForums w/ Amazon

If you'd like to support SNBForums, just use this link and buy anything on Amazon. Thanks!

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!
Back
Top