kuchkovsky
Regular Contributor
While I generally agree with your points regarding firmware, this is simply not true - otherwise, this thread wouldn't exist. Both the UDR7 and UX7 are directly comparable. The new compact consoles (not the old rack-mount ones) plus any single AP are comparable as well, even though it's a bulkier setup than a single home router.The only comparable UniFi line device to ASUS home routers is UDR7
The problem is that their Wi-Fi specs for the Wi-Fi 7 devices (except for the really bulky Enterprise-series APs, probably) generally have worse signal strength, lower speeds, and fewer spatial streams. Asus simply wins in terms of raw performance and coverage. I think a UniFi console paired with a non-UniFi AP would work fine, though - delivering both powerful Wi-Fi and a nice set of router features.
Don't get me wrong - my point isn't that UniFi is bad. It's about acknowledging that it's still not ideal, and that more powerful compact home APs / AIO routers would be a great addition to the current Wi-Fi lineup to match Asus' top-of-the-line hardware. And IPv6 support needs improvement - come on, Ubiquiti, it's not 2012. I can't really blame home router brands for this, but SMB-grade hardware should have top-notch networking features, including first-class IPv6 support - it is the future of the web.
The UDR7 is a bit cheaper than the RT-BE88U (both have non-ideal Wi-Fi 7 specs - the former is a mediocre tri-band, the latter is a top-spec dual-band). The UCG Fiber + E7 combo is more expensive than the GT-BE98 Pro, but cheaper than the GT-BE19000AI. Comparable configs aren't that different. UniFi just doesn't have budget devices in their lineup, unlike Asus.this Honda Civic Type R networking (my term, Tech9®) has one advantage only - it's cheap
