Dismiss Notice

Welcome To SNBForums

SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.

If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!

While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!

UPnP - Multiple Xbox One Gaming Consoles & NAT

Discussion in 'Asuswrt-Merlin' started by BiggShooter, Oct 21, 2016.

  1. RMerlin

    RMerlin Part of the Furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2012
    Messages:
    24,220
    Location:
    Canada
    UPnP/NAT-PMP, no. PCP, perhaps. PCP provides IPv6 support to open pinholes in your firewall when requested by clients, to allow traffic in.
     
  2. Vexira

    Vexira Very Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2017
    Messages:
    759
    Location:
    Australia
    so how does the router then handle devices and applications that rely on upnp?
     
  3. RMerlin

    RMerlin Part of the Furniture

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2012
    Messages:
    24,220
    Location:
    Canada
    Rely on UPnP to do what? If they have their own unique public IP, then they don't rely on UPnP - they simply don't need it.
     
  4. Vexira

    Vexira Very Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2017
    Messages:
    759
    Location:
    Australia
    ahh so its equivalent to dmz, sorry eas trying to wrap my head around it in the absence of nat, because its a straigh public ip its no longer need a puch though method.
     
  5. e38BimmerFN

    e38BimmerFN Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    354
    Location:
    USA
    Wanted to update everyone. My roommates xbox one received an system update day before yesterday. He noticed the dash board had some changes on it. Of course, not to his liking. I asked him to show me the networking section. Low and behold under Advanced Networking is the new Port feature. We only saw virtual ports listed here and not any 3074 ranged ports. I presumed my xbox was not going to see an update however I checked to be sure. Not updated. As soon as I get some time, I'll test to see if this new feature helps with Moderate NAT with some Port Address Restricted NAT kind routers that I have. Not sure if this feature needs to be on just one console or two or more. Will see.
     
  6. strangeluck

    strangeluck Occasional Visitor

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2015
    Messages:
    47
    In theory it should only have to be on the second console, not both. The console running the older os version will use the default port, while consoles with the update can select an alternate port from the new dropdown in settings.
     
  7. e38BimmerFN

    e38BimmerFN Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    354
    Location:
    USA
    Lets hope so. I presume since this feature is coming to all next month that they will some how be handling two or more consoles and port detection when two or more consoles are online with Port Address Restricted or Symmetric NAT kind routers. I have a full cone NAT router online now however will be putting on a Port Address Restricted NAT router for this test.
     
  8. jrmwvu04

    jrmwvu04 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2016
    Messages:
    213
    The benefit to this change is being able to specify the alternate port in the 50000-60000 range that Xbox live will use. That would be useful for manual port forwarding. Hopefully they also change the current behavior where the Xbox doesn’t properly renegotiate the upnp leases. If you have and are using functional upnp on your router (as in johns fork), this change isn’t going to make much of a difference. If you use manual port forwarding, it’ll certainly help. This change only affects system level Xbox live connections, though, not specific games that do their own port manipulation.
     
  9. e38BimmerFN

    e38BimmerFN Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    354
    Location:
    USA
    This also effects non ASUS routers and ASUS routers whom some users might not be using Merlin Or Johns FW and rather OEM FW. Merlin and Johns FW have already been modified to handle NAT issues on ASUS routers.

    We are hoping that with what MS mentioned about on a reddit forum that there was supposed to be some under the hood changes to uPnP so we are hoping that with this new feature and upnp that the new changes are coming into effect and thus port forwarding will not be needed as in most cases, PF is not needed when using uPnP. My testing is all based on uPnP and NAT handling of two or more game consoles running same game and achieving OPEN NAT across the board and behaviro results seen with Port Address Restricted and Symmetric NAT kind routers.
     
  10. jrmwvu04

    jrmwvu04 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2016
    Messages:
    213
    That’s true, but this thread is on an Asuswrt-Merlin board.
    I can’t imagine any of that will change just because you can choose the Xbox live port. I’d be happy to be wrong, but if you’re hoping for this update to be a magic bullet fix, all I’m saying is don’t hold your breath.
     
  11. e38BimmerFN

    e38BimmerFN Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    354
    Location:
    USA
    True however the thread topic is about OPEN NAT on multiple consoles. So it does effect more than just ASUS routers. Also since Merlin FW has fixed and is a alternative solution, it's not a big issue for that FW or Johns Fork FW. Where OEM FW it is.

    With what MS purports in the under the hood changes, we would presume that maybe they are now allowing ports to be changed on two or more game consoles to work with uPnP and XBL. Before this was not available. We do have hopes of this helping, however we will see if this helps with two or more game consoles running same game on routers with Port Restricted or Symmetric NAT. If there PORT feature helps with IPv4 and uPnP with routers handling Port Address Restricted or Symmetric NAT, then this might close this chapter. Again this is only for these configurations. IPv6 we hope will not appear to have any of these issue as others have already mentioned.

    Again, this is only for these NAT kinds on any router using it. This isn't an issue with routers deployed with FULL CONE NAT.

    Test results will be posted here:
    http://badmodems.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=21
     
  12. e38BimmerFN

    e38BimmerFN Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    354
    Location:
    USA
  13. Vexira

    Vexira Very Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2017
    Messages:
    759
    Location:
    Australia
    odd try enabling the multicast settings under iptv leave proxy at 0.
     
  14. e38BimmerFN

    e38BimmerFN Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    354
    Location:
    USA
    This would be on a non Merlin ASUS router. Should have mentioned that. Sorry. :(
     
  15. Vexira

    Vexira Very Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2017
    Messages:
    759
    Location:
    Australia
    Latest firmware?
     
  16. e38BimmerFN

    e38BimmerFN Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    354
    Location:
    USA
    Last Merlin FW was 380.68 if I remember. Wasn't any of the _# versions
     
  17. Vexira

    Vexira Very Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2017
    Messages:
    759
    Location:
    Australia
    ahhh I see
     
  18. e38BimmerFN

    e38BimmerFN Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    354
    Location:
    USA
    As far as I'm concerned, this isn't a problem any more for ASUS routers as along as you use Merlin FW. From what I'm seeing with other router Mfrs, on some older and newer routers, if NAT Filtering UI is a option, i.e. older model routers, and you can set OPEN or Endpoint Independent in the OEM FW UI, this will change the NAT kind from Port Address Restrict NAT to FULL CONE NAT which will and should help attain OPEN NAT for two or more same game consoles. I have older D-Link routers and a newer NetGear R7800. These have NAT Filter features which seem to help. However going forward, for D-Link, they removed the NAT Filter feature in more recent versions of FW thus limiting the NAT kind to only Port Address Restricted. Newer generation routers don't even have NAT Filters features anymore and are not hard coded PAR or Symmetric NAT. From what I'm told, router MFrs are wanting to go to and maintain PAR or Symmetric NAT kinds since they are more secure than FULL CONE NAT. I presume it would be up to router Mfrs to allow end users to switch between them which I see that NG OEM FW still seems to do. D-Link as removed this UI feature in all of there newer generation routers. So until IPv6 becomes more come place, users with two or more same game consoles should look into Mfr routers that support either FULL CONE NAT or have the flexibility with NAT FILTER UI Features that can configure the router for FULL CONE NAT when two or more same game consoles/PC are being used and connected. And again, all of this doesn't apply for single game console/PC users.

    Hopefully maybe going forward, that game Mfrs will be more aware of this issue and help out in there development as well. :rolleyes: Seems that some Multi-Player games when two or more game consoles are running the same game need FULL CONE NAT routers to be able to achieve OPEN NAT across the board.

    I suggest that anyone with two or more review tested models over on badmodems.com.
    http://badmodems.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=21
    Yes ALL ASUS routers that support and are loaded with Merlin FW will be good ones to use. Be careful, some ASUS routers don't support Merlin, yet. o_O
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2017
    BiggShooter and Vexira like this.

Share This Page