I have a RT-N66U, which is running 38-2-em. I used to use this as my main router keeping the cable modem (Cisco EPC3825 8x4 DOCSIS 3) in a bridge position. My ISP provides a 350/20 connection and when connected directly to the modem from my iMac desktop, I could get at the most around 270-280M/16M bandwidth.
Scenario 1: When I connect using the RT-N66U as the main router, I could get a maximum of around 135-140M/16M with the hardware accelaration (HA) ON. With QoS the download speed goes down to 75-70M. Therefore I turned the QoS off and kept the HA on. I was planning to upgrade to a AC router hoping that I can get better download speeds.
Scenario 2: Then, I decided to switch the cable modem from bridge to a ROUTER position, let it handle the NAT & DHCP and firewall and keeping the RT-N66U function as an AP. Now I could get the same download speed as in the original setting: that is 270-280M/16M. I could never get over 175-180M with the RT-N66U functioning as a router.
I would be happy with this and would not bother you with my questions, however, I have lost the possibility of using the OpenVPN (which is rather essential for me) and my DDNS provider (since using a variable IP from the ISP).
Since I reallly don't understand much about the infrastructure of the network:
Q1) should I assume that may cable modem is doing a better job in handling the DHCP & NAT than my RT-N66U?
Q2) Is it possible that a much cheaper and 3 years old Cisco cable modem is better than RT-N66U as a router or is it just me who cannot adjust properly the RT-N66U or is it the firmware in it causing the problems?
Q3) If I bought a AC66U or AC68U router, could I increase my download speed (I assume that equals to WAN > LAN throughput?) from that of RT-N66U?
Any comments would be very welcome - thanks.
Scenario 1: When I connect using the RT-N66U as the main router, I could get a maximum of around 135-140M/16M with the hardware accelaration (HA) ON. With QoS the download speed goes down to 75-70M. Therefore I turned the QoS off and kept the HA on. I was planning to upgrade to a AC router hoping that I can get better download speeds.
Scenario 2: Then, I decided to switch the cable modem from bridge to a ROUTER position, let it handle the NAT & DHCP and firewall and keeping the RT-N66U function as an AP. Now I could get the same download speed as in the original setting: that is 270-280M/16M. I could never get over 175-180M with the RT-N66U functioning as a router.
I would be happy with this and would not bother you with my questions, however, I have lost the possibility of using the OpenVPN (which is rather essential for me) and my DDNS provider (since using a variable IP from the ISP).
Since I reallly don't understand much about the infrastructure of the network:
Q1) should I assume that may cable modem is doing a better job in handling the DHCP & NAT than my RT-N66U?
Q2) Is it possible that a much cheaper and 3 years old Cisco cable modem is better than RT-N66U as a router or is it just me who cannot adjust properly the RT-N66U or is it the firmware in it causing the problems?
Q3) If I bought a AC66U or AC68U router, could I increase my download speed (I assume that equals to WAN > LAN throughput?) from that of RT-N66U?
Any comments would be very welcome - thanks.
Last edited: