[Release] Asuswrt-Merlin 384.16 (and 384.13_6) are now available

  • ATTENTION! As of November 1, 2020, you are not able to reply to threads 6 months after the thread is opened if there are more than 500 posts in the thread.
    Threads will not be locked, so posts may still be edited by their authors.
    Just start a new thread on the topic to post if you get an error message when trying to reply to a thread.
Status
Not open for further replies.

RMerlin

Asuswrt-Merlin dev
Great analogy, and I totally understood :)
The DoT hostname to IP conversion could rely on the regular DNS we define a few lines above, but in that case some queries (at least to retrieve DoT IP) would go "unsecured", am I right?

Correct. And they could potentially be hijacked too, or at the very least blocked.
 

northumberland

Occasional Visitor
Just flashed two ax88u out of the box to replace an ac88u and an aged 3200..

Noticing that when setting the 5ghz to 160mhz that it's reporting 10mhz (Though I think one of them did use 160) is this a fluke of DFS, reporting hardware, or of Asus drivers? There seemed to be some collation with 2.4ghz too bit tbh I'd restarted the router too many times to confirm.

Anyone else seen this or should I start again?

Thanks for supporting these excellent Asus Routers for so long RMerlin, and Happy Birthday!
 

JIPG

Regular Contributor
I have just updated my RT-AC87U to FW 384.13_6 without any problem. Only one hour, but running OK as usual. :D

Thank you Eric!
(and to the miron, we do not forget you;)).
 
Last edited:

Milan

Senior Member
Just flashed two ax88u out of the box to replace an ac88u and an aged 3200..

Noticing that when setting the 5ghz to 160mhz that it's reporting 10mhz (Though I think one of them did use 160) is this a fluke of DFS, reporting hardware, or of Asus drivers? There seemed to be some collation with 2.4ghz too bit tbh I'd restarted the router too many times to confirm.

Anyone else seen this or should I start again?

Thanks for supporting these excellent Asus Routers for so long RMerlin, and Happy Birthday!

i see the same in wifi tools only ...
 

northumberland

Occasional Visitor
i see the same in wifi tools only ...
That's what I was thinking, I'll ignore WiFi tools for now as that's an Asus/Broadcom fix I'd think (is stock same/similar?)

Go back to my trusty Android app :p

Thanks
 

Pak Kriss

Regular Contributor
RT-AC86U "dirty" upgraded .13 -> .16

All good ATM

Sent from my OnePlus 7 Pro using Asus RT-AC86U & Merlin 384.16 (dirty upgraded from .13)
 

Equinox

Occasional Visitor
RT-AC3100 updated to .16 from .15. Everything works as expected except:

Failed to update Signature. It used to work on version .15. Is it happens on anyone?
 

Attachments

  • Capture1.PNG
    Capture1.PNG
    55.6 KB · Views: 113

ATLga

Senior Member
It was patched weeks ago, I just didn't want to attract too much attention, so I only added the changelog entry at the last minute.

Sent from my SM-T720 using Tapatalk

Where was this 2020 CVE patched weeks ago? For example, I don't see it patched on stock ac86u stock firmware? Do you mean it was patched on your version only? Curious...
 

JIPG

Regular Contributor
RT-AC3100 updated to .16 from .15. Everything works as expected except:

Failed to update Signature. It used to work on version .15. Is it happens on anyone?
It seems to be the last one. I am in the same version of signature.
 

S.claus

Regular Contributor
Can somebody try and do a Signature version check for me, please. I'm on 2.170 and I'm getting Signature update failed.
 

Ro berto

Regular Contributor
* Added traffic meter to the main status page.

thanks for the update RMerlin!

is it possible to adjust the limits of the traffic meter so the bars only fill when I'm hitting my ISP speed limit? (eg. 50/10 Mbps download and unload speed).

Sent from my SM-G970F using Tapatalk
 

LimJK

Very Senior Member
Can somebody try and do a Signature version check for me, please. I'm on 2.170 and I'm getting Signature update failed.
+1 Same here
 

micer45

New Around Here
First post and first thing is big thanks to @RMerlin for this software.

I had a AC87U running with no issues but notice support was stopping soon so bought a AX58U and was running 384.16_beta2 with no issues.

Just updated the AX58U to the 384.16 release but seem to be having issues with wireless devices randomly losing connection to the internet.
I went back to the beta2 and it seems to be stable again.

I am also running YazFi 4.02 so don't know if it is related.

Is there much difference between the beta2 and release code?
 

mcosty

New Around Here
Thanks for the update!!! Updated ac86u from .15 to .16. Noticed my internet speed was reduced. Runner/Flow control were Disabled(QOS). I never have QOS enabled but it was after the update. Turned it off and Runner/Flow control are enabled and gig internet speed are back.
 

Igor

Regular Contributor
New test on ASUS RT-AC68U. FW 384.16

USB 2.0 port and JetFlash Transcend 16GB USB 2.0 - mounted
USB 2.0 port and JetFlash Transcend 32GB USB 3.0 - mounted
USB 3.0 port and JetFlash Transcend 16GB USB 2.0 - mounted
USB 3.0 port and JetFlash Transcend 32GB USB 3.0 - kernel: usb 1-1: USB disconnect, address 2
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest threads

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!
Top