Jul 31 19:15:22 coova-chilli[23855]: ssl.c: 384: Spurious SSL handshake interrupt [Hint: Usually just one of those OpenSSL confusions!?]
Jul 31 19:15:24 coova-chilli[23958]: ssl.c: 384: Spurious SSL handshake interrupt [Hint: Usually just one of those OpenSSL confusions!?]
Jul 31 19:15:34 coova-chilli[24041]: ssl.c: 384: Spurious SSL handshake interrupt [Hint: Usually just one of those OpenSSL confusions!?]
Jul 31 19:15:35 coova-chilli[24572]: ssl.c: 382: 104 (Connection reset by peer) SSL handshake interrupted by system [Hint: Stop button pressed in browser?!]
Jul 31 19:15:40 coova-chilli[24081]: ssl.c: 382: 104 (Connection reset by peer) SSL handshake interrupted by system [Hint: Stop button pressed in browser?!]
Jul 31 19:15:41 coova-chilli[24110]: ssl.c: 384: Spurious SSL handshake interrupt [Hint: Usually just one of those OpenSSL confusions!?]
Jul 31 19:15:43 coova-chilli[24615]: ssl.c: 382: 104 (Connection reset by peer) SSL handshake interrupted by system [Hint: Stop button pressed in browser?!]
Jul 31 19:15:45 coova-chilli[24155]: ssl.c: 384: Spurious SSL handshake interrupt [Hint: Usually just one of those OpenSSL confusions!?]
Jul 31 19:15:52 coova-chilli[6273]: chilli.c: 5173: New DHCP request from MAC=46-91-B0-EB-19-FC
Jul 31 19:15:52 coova-chilli[6273]: chilli.c: 5060: Client MAC=46-91-B0-EB-19-FC assigned IP 192.168.52.4
Jul 31 19:15:55 coova-chilli[24748]: ssl.c: 382: 104 (Connection reset by peer) SSL handshake interrupted by system [Hint: Stop button pressed in browser?!]
Jul 31 19:15:57 coova-chilli[24803]: ssl.c: 384: Spurious SSL handshake interrupt [Hint: Usually just one of those OpenSSL confusions!?]
Jul 31 19:15:57 coova-chilli[24694]: ssl.c: 384: Spurious SSL handshake interrupt [Hint: Usually just one of those OpenSSL confusions!?]
Jul 31 19:15:57 coova-chilli[24640]: ssl.c: 384: Spurious SSL handshake interrupt [Hint: Usually just one of those OpenSSL confusions!?]
Jul 31 19:15:57 coova-chilli[24833]: redir.c: 2038: SSL_read(0) failed!
Jul 31 19:15:58 coova-chilli[24835]: redir.c: 2038: SSL_read(0) failed!
Jul 31 19:15:58 coova-chilli[24837]: redir.c: 2038: SSL_read(0) failed!
Jul 31 19:15:59 coova-chilli[24851]: redir.c: 2038: 104 (Connection reset by peer) SSL_read(0) failed!
Jul 31 19:15:59 coova-chilli[24862]: redir.c: 2038: SSL_read(0) failed!
Jul 31 19:16:02 coova-chilli[24875]: redir.c: 2038: SSL_read(0) failed!
Jul 31 19:16:02 coova-chilli[24895]: ssl.c: 384: Spurious SSL handshake interrupt [Hint: Usually just one of those OpenSSL confusions!?]
Jul 31 19:16:02 coova-chilli[24896]: redir.c: 2038: 104 (Connection reset by peer) SSL_read(0) failed!
Jul 31 19:16:03 coova-chilli[24897]: ssl.c: 384: Spurious SSL handshake interrupt [Hint: Usually just one of those OpenSSL confusions!?]
Jul 31 19:16:06 coova-chilli[24926]: redir.c: 2038: SSL_read(0) failed!
Jul 31 19:16:14 coova-chilli[24997]: redir.c: 2038: SSL_read(0) failed!
Jul 31 19:16:29 coova-chilli[25464]: redir.c: 2038: SSL_read(0) failed!
Jul 31 19:16:44 coova-chilli[6273]: chilli.c: 6125: Successful UAM login from username=noauth IP=192.168.52.4
Jul 31 19:16:50 coova-chilli[24726]: ssl.c: 382: 104 (Connection reset by peer) SSL handshake interrupted by system [Hint: Stop button pressed in browser?!]
Jul 31 19:16:57 coova-chilli[25766]: redir.c: 2038: 104 (Connection reset by peer) SSL_read(0) failed!
Jul 31 19:17:03 coova-chilli[25877]: redir.c: 2038: SSL_read(0) failed!
Jul 31 19:17:34 coova-chilli[24596]: redir.c: 63: Client process timed out: 2
Jul 31 19:17:43 coova-chilli[24676]: redir.c: 63: Client process timed out: 2
Jul 31 19:17:53 coova-chilli[24796]: redir.c: 63: Client process timed out: 2
Jul 31 19:18:07 coova-chilli[26634]: redir.c: 2038: SSL_read(0) failed!
Jul 31 19:19:41 coova-chilli[27902]: ssl.c: 384: Spurious SSL handshake interrupt [Hint: Usually just one of those OpenSSL confusions!?]
Jul 31 19:20:06 coova-chilli[28136]: redir.c: 2038: SSL_read(0) failed!
I nitially tried also left-aligning the header, but something just felt really odd with it, so I moved them back to centered. I think it might have been because of the mixture of small/wide field, so it caused some areas to be overly crowded (by the proximity of a short header and the label of the next field), with a very wide area empty of anything to the right, while with centered it made things more "roomy".I like the clickable public IPs. Not as in love with the left-justified fields and the hyperlink underline makes things slightly harder (for me) to read. The centered headings feel odd when the rest is left-justified. Not deal-breakers, but initial reaction to change.![]()
Asus' engineers did the investigation there, and pointed me at a potential cause (which turned out to be accurate).I am so glad you did your detective work, this bug was not 'elementary my dear Watson'
yeh thanks i noticed my network type adapter is know for issuesThat device's Ethernet port is constantly flapping, you need to figure out why. Most common cause is an out-of-spec cable that's unable to sustain a reliable 2.5 Gbps link. There are also some very buggy Intel 2.5 Gbps NICs that are notoriously bad.
ec 31 19:00:37 kernel: skb_free_task created successfully with start budget 32, period 10ms
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: bcm_tcp_task created successfully with budget 256 ,cpumask:0x6
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: enet_kthread_init:L637 ENET system contructed and configured enet-kthrd thread
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: enet_kthread_handler:L595 Instantiating ENET thread
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: broadcomThermalDrv 8106037c.brcm-therm: init chipId 0x6765 (CPU cnt present 4 online 4 possible 4 active 4)
Dec 31 19:00:37 kernel: eth0 (Int switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 0) (phyId: 9) Link Up at 2500 mbps full duplex AN: On
Dec 31 19:00:40 kernel: eth1 (Int switch port: 5) (Logical Port: 5) (phyId: 6) Link Up at 10000 mbps full duplex AN: Off
Dec 31 19:01:14 Mastiff: init
Jul 31 18:28:36 crond[3922]: time disparity of 832227 minutes detected
Jan 9 15:16:33 crond[3922]: time disparity of 15012163 minutes detected
Jan 9 15:16:33 Aaews: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>dispatch_tunnel_event event_code = NATNL_TNL_EVENT_DEADLOCK
Jan 9 15:16:33 kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU
Jan 9 15:16:33 kernel: rcu: 1-...!: (3 ticks this GP) idle=0c6/0/0x1 softirq=1114906/1114908 fqs=5
Jan 9 15:16:33 kernel: rcu: (t=900728757016 jiffies g=1309641 q=111756)
Jan 9 15:16:33 kernel: Call trace:
Jan 9 15:16:33 kernel: __switch_to+0x148/0x170
Jan 9 15:16:33 kernel: 0x75745f6863746170
Jan 9 15:16:33 kernel: Call trace:
Jan 9 15:16:33 kernel: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x150
Jan 9 15:16:33 kernel: show_stack+0x14/0x20
Jan 9 15:16:33 kernel: sched_show_task+0x100/0x120
Just giving positive confirmation that my router has not checked for updates since installing beta3, as expected.577dcd9134 rc: skip periodic FW checks if disabled
I had the V2 of that infamous chip on my previous motherboard. I gave up and bought a cheap Realtek PCI-E adapter that worked flawlessly until I upgrade the whole PC. I made sure this new motherboard wouldn't use an Intel chip.I have replaced the driver for me Intel
yeh thanks i noticed my network type adapter is know for issues
Intel(R) Ethernet Controller (3) I225-V
Interestingly, I learned by accident that navigating to the AiMesh page triggers a firmware check. I don’t use AiMesh, but was heading to the Management tab to disable LEDs. Visited there 3x and the webs_update.sh script is called directly.Just giving positive confirmation that my router has not checked for updates since installing beta3, as expected.
Aug 1 13:30:33 rc_service: cfg_server 2846:notify_rc stop_fw_check
Aug 1 13:30:34 rc_service: cfg_server 2846:notify_rc start_fw_check
Aug 1 13:32:03 rc_service: cfg_server 2846:notify_rc stop_fw_check
Aug 1 13:32:04 rc_service: cfg_server 2846:notify_rc start_fw_check
Aug 1 13:32:44 rc_service: cfg_server 2846:notify_rc stop_fw_check
Aug 1 13:32:45 rc_service: cfg_server 2846:notify_rc start_fw_check
Just add a short signature so everyone can see your setup that you're referring to.Meant to mention: it's on a GT-BE98 pro
start_fw_check() calls are done from cfg_client and cfg_server, the components of AiMesh. I'd rather not interfere with either of them as I don't know what's behind that code. For instance they may expect the result from the script to be present after the calls.Interestingly, I learned by accident that navigating to the AiMesh page triggers a firmware check. I don’t use AiMesh, but was heading to the Management tab to disable LEDs. Visited there 3x and the webs_update.sh script is called directly.
Code:Aug 1 13:30:33 rc_service: cfg_server 2846:notify_rc stop_fw_check Aug 1 13:30:34 rc_service: cfg_server 2846:notify_rc start_fw_check Aug 1 13:32:03 rc_service: cfg_server 2846:notify_rc stop_fw_check Aug 1 13:32:04 rc_service: cfg_server 2846:notify_rc start_fw_check Aug 1 13:32:44 rc_service: cfg_server 2846:notify_rc stop_fw_check Aug 1 13:32:45 rc_service: cfg_server 2846:notify_rc start_fw_check
Can we move on to a final release at this point ?
Are you in a rush to get anywhere?
Patience is a virtue friend. Hold tight until everything is ready and solid.
Sounds like beta3 is petty much at the finish line, and just validating no new reports.
I have been patient. It is what it is. I was just asking.
I decided to have another short beta round.
so you don't have to keep a tab open on SNB and monitor daily.
Welcome To SNBForums
SNBForums is a community for anyone who wants to learn about or discuss the latest in wireless routers, network storage and the ins and outs of building and maintaining a small network.
If you'd like to post a question, simply register and have at it!
While you're at it, please check out SmallNetBuilder for product reviews and our famous Router Charts, Ranker and plenty more!