What's new

ROG Rapture GT-AC5300 (Owners)

  • SNBForums Code of Conduct

    SNBForums is a community for everyone, no matter what their level of experience.

    Please be tolerant and patient of others, especially newcomers. We are all here to share and learn!

    The rules are simple: Be patient, be nice, be helpful or be gone!

Do you have “Automatically connect to DNS servers” Yes or No?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Why do I get so many rejects when I have a perfect signal?

Sep 23 19:10:07 roamast: eth7: add client [5c:96:56:d0:d0:cb] to monitor list
Sep 23 19:10:25 roamast: discover candidate node [4C:ED:FB:90:ED:20](rssi: -71dbm) for weak signal strength client [5C:96:56:D0:D0:CB](rssi: -79dbm)
Sep 23 19:10:25 roamast: roaming reject!!! candidate rssi over threshold(-70dbm)
Sep 23 19:10:30 roamast: discover candidate node [4C:ED:FB:90:ED:20](rssi: -71dbm) for weak signal strength client [5C:96:56:D0:D0:CB](rssi: -79dbm)
Sep 23 19:10:30 roamast: roaming reject!!! candidate rssi over threshold(-70dbm)
Sep 23 19:10:35 roamast: discover candidate node [4C:ED:FB:90:ED:20](rssi: -71dbm) for weak signal strength client [58:55:CA:13:6A:57](rssi: -77dbm)
Sep 23 19:10:35 roamast: roaming reject!!! candidate rssi over threshold(-70dbm)
Sep 23 19:10:45 roamast: discover candidate node [4C:ED:FB:90:ED:20](rssi: -71dbm) for weak signal strength client [58:55:CA:13:6A:57](rssi: -77dbm)
Sep 23 19:10:45 roamast: roaming reject!!! candidate rssi over threshold(-70dbm)
Sep 23 19:10:55 roamast: discover candidate node [4C:ED:FB:90:ED:20](rssi: -71dbm) for weak signal strength client [58:55:CA:13:6A:57](rssi: -77dbm)
Sep 23 19:10:55 roamast: roaming reject!!! candidate rssi over threshold(-70dbm)
Sep 23 19:11:05 roamast: discover candidate node [4C:ED:FB:90:ED:20](rssi: -71dbm) for weak signal strength client [58:55:CA:13:6A:57](rssi: -77dbm)
Sep 23 19:11:05 roamast: roaming reject!!! candidate rssi over threshold(-70dbm)
Sep 23 19:11:15 roamast: discover candidate node [4C:ED:FB:90:ED:20](rssi: -71dbm) for weak signal strength client [5C:96:56:D0:D0:CB](rssi: -77dbm)
Sep 23 19:11:15 roamast: roaming reject!!! candidate rssi over threshold(-70dbm)
Sep 23 19:11:22 roamast: eth6: add client [00:02:d1:45:60:7d] to monitor list
Sep 23 19:11:30 roamast: discover candidate node [4C:ED:FB:90:ED:20](rssi: -71dbm) for weak signal strength client [58:55:CA:13:6A:57](rssi: -77dbm)
Sep 23 19:11:30 roamast: roaming reject!!! candidate rssi over threshold(-70dbm)
Sep 23 19:11:40 roamast: discover candidate node [4C:ED:FB:90:ED:20](rssi: -71dbm) for weak signal strength client [58:55:CA:13:6A:57](rssi: -77dbm)
Sep 23 19:11:40 roamast: roaming reject!!! candidate rssi over threshold(-70dbm)
Sep 23 19:11:50 roamast: discover candidate node [4C:ED:FB:90:ED:20](rssi: -71dbm) for weak signal strength client [58:55:CA:13:6A:57](rssi: -77dbm)
Sep 23 19:11:50 roamast: roaming reject!!! candidate rssi over threshold(-70dbm)



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Here is my Smart connect, does this look ok?

4fde908de282b8bfca4c548f1b7e5fc6.png
 
This happen after the recent firmware update...…...
Sep 23 21:31:26 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link DOWN.
Sep 23 21:31:29 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link UP 1000 mbps full duplex
Sep 23 21:31:37 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link DOWN.
Sep 23 21:31:40 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link UP 1000 mbps full duplex
Sep 23 21:31:42 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link DOWN.
Sep 23 21:31:45 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link UP 1000 mbps full duplex
Sep 23 21:31:48 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link DOWN.
Sep 23 21:31:51 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link UP 10 mbps full duplex
Sep 23 21:35:26 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link DOWN.
Sep 23 21:35:30 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link UP 1000 mbps full duplex
Sep 23 21:35:44 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link DOWN.
Sep 23 21:35:48 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link UP 1000 mbps full duplex

My first question is what physical port on the router is this, and is anyone else getting this error? I have no connection problems, but I'm unsure why my link keeps dropping. Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
This happen after the recent firmware update...…...
Sep 23 21:31:26 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link DOWN.
Sep 23 21:31:29 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link UP 1000 mbps full duplex
Sep 23 21:31:37 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link DOWN.
Sep 23 21:31:40 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link UP 1000 mbps full duplex
Sep 23 21:31:42 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link DOWN.
Sep 23 21:31:45 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link UP 1000 mbps full duplex
Sep 23 21:31:48 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link DOWN.
Sep 23 21:31:51 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link UP 10 mbps full duplex
Sep 23 21:35:26 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link DOWN.
Sep 23 21:35:30 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link UP 1000 mbps full duplex
Sep 23 21:35:44 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link DOWN.
Sep 23 21:35:48 kernel: eth1 (Ext switch port: 0) (Logical Port: 8) Link UP 1000 mbps full duplex

My first question is what physical port on the router is this, and is anyone else getting this error? I'm have no connection problems, but I'm unsure why my link keeps dropping. Thanks in advance

So I might have solved my own problem. I recently put my gaming computer(Asus Rog Strix GD30ci), plugged into port 1, in "low power saving mode". I put it in back in "high performance," and the error has seemed to disappear.
 
Sep 23 19:10:07 roamast: eth7: add client [5c:96:56:d0:d0:cb] to monitor list

Add the client [5c:96:56:d0:d0:cb] to roam program queue.

Sep 23 19:10:25 roamast: discover candidate node [4C:ED:FB:90:ED:20](rssi: -71dbm) for weak signal strength client [5C:96:56:D0:D0:CB](rssi: -79dbm)

Found a new Node/AP [4C:ED:FB:90:ED:20] can be reached for the client [5c:96:56:d0:d0:cb]

Sep 23 19:10:25 roamast: roaming reject!!! candidate rssi over threshold(-70dbm)

According to the signal quality did not better than served Node, Reject this event.
 
Hi , i got this router , why my 5ghz-1 band not visible /broadcasting on iphone ;samsung .
is like the band is missing ? but in the router is on .
i have the same problem to with the ASUS RT AC3200.
already try downgrade the firmware , but no luck .
Any idea what happened to this router ?

It is show in apple tv , i just dont know what happened, is there any setting that i do wrong ?
 
Last edited:
hidden SSID?

do you see a strong signal with a WiFi app where it should be from this router and band?
If not probably faulty hardware.
 
bandwith set to auto on ch. 36, simple SSID only letters/numbers and password too, WPA2-personal AES, airtime fairness off?
 
Try to factory reset your router and see what happens. You may have to do this 2-3 times before you manually configure your router. It has been a known issue with GT. If things repeat, please post your wireless configuration for that particular band to see if anyone in the SNB community can assist you with a solution.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Please read the irony, but understand the message.
My GT running AiMesh is 18 days uptime. And that's a record!
I used to loose a 5GHz radio way before reaching that uptime.
Now both 5 GHz radios are serving clients. And that makes me happy!

The power on 2.4 is crap. Like really crap on router while perfect on node (RT-AC68U). And I cannot send feedback from router's interface to complain about it! But I don't really care about that...
+Arthur_Ln@ for a suggestion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eJC
Here is my Smart connect, does this look ok?

There are some REALLY good articles about SmartConnect here on SNB. Do a bit of a search and you'll get a great primer on this feature.

To me, however, SmartConnect is TOO smart. And exposes TOO many settings. I recommend avoiding SmartConnect. Why not designate different bands for different needs and allow specific devices to connect to those bands?
 

Latest threads

Sign Up For SNBForums Daily Digest

Get an update of what's new every day delivered to your mailbox. Sign up here!
Top