Viktor Jaep
Part of the Furniture
Here's the current FCC ban list. No mention of routers that have been given an exception as of yet.
Guess I'll be going with Enterprise-grade from now on. Might need to take out a small loan to help pay for the annual maintenance fees.I have a question. From the FCC FAQ:
How are routers defined?
- The FCC followed the definitions in the National Security Determination.
- “Routers” is defined by National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Internal Report 8425A to mean consumer-grade networking devices that are primarily intended for residential use and can be installed by the customer. Routers forward data packets, most commonly Internet Protocol (IP) packets, between networked systems.
Does it mean a device like this is automatically approved since it's not consumer-grade?
![]()
Dream Machine Pro - Ubiquiti Store
10G Cloud Gateway with 100+ UniFi device / 1,000+ client support and 3.5 Gbps IPS routing.store.ui.com
It may be professional series, rack mountable, serve 1000+ clients, etc. ... but it's $380.
www.asus.com
How do you know this isn't based on a "real security threat"?Please be lenient with a bit of political commentary in this thread. After all, the decision that brought about this policy was not based on a real security threat. You know this as well as the rest of us here. I just hope that I can live long enough to see a lot more kindness in the world. Including the US.
How do you know this isn't based on a "real security threat"?
The agency (FCC) warned that "malicious actors have exploited security gaps in foreign-made routers to attack American households, disrupt networks, enable espionage, and facilitate intellectual property theft," citing multiple cases in which such devices were used in cyberattacks targeting U.S. infrastructure.
The rule applies broadly to devices produced outside the country but largely targets routers with Chinese origins. The world's networking hardware supply is largely dependent on China for manufacturing and engineering.
Estimates in recent years indicate that devices with significant Chinese supply chain ties account for the majority of home routers used in the U.S.
TP-Link, a China-founded router manufacturer and one of the top-selling brands on Amazon, has faced growing scrutiny in Washington amid cyber incidents and broader concerns about foreign-linked networking equipment.
So future releases (after March 1, 2027) of the Asuswrt-Merlin firmware that many members of this forum like/use might become illegal in the US?Also in the mix: firmware upgrades to previously approved routers are also banned. Monday the FCC issued a waiver of the ban through March 1, 2027.
That is actually a very good question. Before the ban, responsible parties were permitted to make changes that did not degrade the performance of the equipment as long as it wasn't covered. With the ban, responsible parties are not permitted to make such changes; that was almost immediately waived "at least" through March 1, 2027. In theory, absent further action, Asus would be prohibited from making such changes after that. But Merlin isn't Asus. If the router is modified by any party not working under the authority of Asus, then the party performing the modifications, if located with the US, becomes the new responsible party. Now, Merlin isn't in the US, so isn't prohibited from performing the modifications. But if I install Merlin's software on my router in the US, am I prohibited from doing this? Who knows what that means, or what rules will be in place then?So future releases (after March 1, 2027) of the Asuswrt-Merlin firmware that many members of this forum like/use might become illegal in the US?![]()
A good, logical article on the topic. A sense of the absurdness similar to some of you who have posted in this thread:
![]()
www.techdirt.com
Sums it up perfectly... "Most of the Trump administration 'cybersecurity' solutions have been indistinguishable from a foreign attack."Another article...
![]()
Brendan Carr Tries To ‘Ban’ All Foreign Routers In Lazy, Legally Dubious Shakedown
Taking a break from attacking the First Amendment, FCC boss Brendan Carr this week engaged in a strange bit of performance art: his FCC announced that they’d be effectively adding all foreign…www.techdirt.com
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.